Ordaz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

STIPULATION to voluntary remand pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and to entry of judgment for Plaintiff signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/15/2019. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration JENNIFER A. KENNEY Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8945 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Jennifer.A.Kenney@SSA.gov Attorneys for Defendant 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 OLGA ORDAZ, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No.: 1:17-CV-01141-BAM STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF 19 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that this action be remanded for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), sentence four. On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for a new decision. The Appeals Council will instruct the ALJ to obtain medical and psychological expert evidence regarding the nature and severity of, and potential limitations resulting from, Plaintiff’s impairments during the period at issue. The Appeals Council will instruct the ALJ to reassess Plaintiff’s subjective statements about her symptoms. The Appeals Stip. & Prop. Order to Remand 1:17-CV-01141-BAM 1 1 Council will instruct the ALJ to further evaluate whether Plaintiff has the residual functional 2 capacity to perform her past relevant work and, if appropriate, obtain supplemental vocational 3 expert testimony to assist in determining what jobs exist, if any, for Plaintiff given her age, 4 5 education, vocational factors and residual functional capacity. The Appeals Council will instruct 6 the ALJ to take further action, as warranted, to complete the administrative record and resolve 7 the above issues. 8 The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final 9 10 11 judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. Respectfully submitted, 12 13 14 Dated: July 20, 2018 /s/ *Melissa Newel (*as authorized by email on Jul. 20, 2018) MELISSA NEWEL Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: July 20, 2018 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 By: 22 23 /s/ Jennifer A. Kenney JENNIFER A. KENNEY Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 24 ORDER 25 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be 26 27 28 remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action consistent /// Stip. & Prop. Order to Remand 1:17-CV-01141-BAM 2 1 with the above stipulation. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a final judgment in favor 2 of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara August 15, 2019 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. & Prop. Order to Remand 1:17-CV-01141-BAM 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?