Wiseman v. Doe et al
Filing
31
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Premature Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum as Premature re 29 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/9/18. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
CHESTER RAY WISEMAN,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
GONZALEZ, et al.,
14
Case No. 1:17-cv-01166-AWI-JLT (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
PREMATURE PETITION FOR WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
(Doc. 29)
Defendants.
15
16
17
Plaintiff filed a petition requesting that an inmate witness be required to appear before the
18
Court to corroborate the allegations he has made in this action. (Doc. 29.) However, there is
19
nothing currently pending before the Court for which any testimony is required. The order which
20
opened discovery recently issued in this action, (see Doc. 27), and the parties should be engaging
21
in discovery thereunder. Witnesses will be compelled to appear upon a showing of knowledge of
22
the events at issue in this action if/when an event occurs that requires testimony.1
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
1
In the most cases, witnesses are not necessary until trial. If/when trial is scheduled, the Court will provide the
plaintiff the requirements and instructions for seeking the attendance of witnesses for trial.
1
1
2
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff’s petition for writ of habeas corpus ad
testificandum, filed October 3, 2018 (Doc. 29), is DENIED as premature.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 9, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?