Brown v. Kern Valley State Prison, et al.
Filing
15
ORDER DENYING 12 Change of Address to Street Address; ORDER for Plaintiff to File New Notice of Change of Address Within Fourteen Days; ORDER Directing Clerk to Send Change of Address From to Plaintiff at Kern Valley State Prison, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/21/17. (Attachments: # 1 Change of Address Form) (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DERRICK BROWN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
vs.
1:17-cv-01168-GSA-PC
ORDER DENYING CHANGE OF
ADDRESS TO STREET ADDRESS
(ECF No. 12.)
KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE
NEW NOTICE OF CHANGE OF
Defendants.
ADDRESS WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO
SEND CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM
TO PLAINTIFF AT KERN VALLEY
STATE PRISON
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
I.
BACKGROUND
24
Derrick Brown (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights
25
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on
26
August 18, 2017. (ECF No. 1.)
27
28
On September 16, 2013, Plaintiff filed a notice requesting the court to change his
address of record from Kern Valley State Prison to his sister’s street address. (ECF No. 12.)
1
1
2
II.
CHANGE OF ADDRESS TO ADDRESS OTHER THAN PRO SE LITIGANT’S
ACTUAL ADDRESS
3
Plaintiff may not change his address of record with the court to someone else’s address.
4
There is no Federal Rule of Civil Procedure or Local Rule allowing service of court and other
5
legal documents at an address other than a pro se litigant’s actual address. Local Rule 131,
6
Local Rule 182(f), and Local Rule 183(b) require pro se litigants to inform the court of their
7
addresses and to keep the court informed of any change in their addresses. There is no
8
authority for the proposition that a pro se litigant can simply request the court to serve him at a
9
different address.
10
There may be special circumstances in which the court could serve a pro se litigant at a
11
separate address. However, no such special circumstances are apparent here. Moreover,
12
service at a location other than Plaintiff=s place of residence can pose significant problems with
13
ensuring that Plaintiff receives all court documentation, meets court deadlines and prepares and
14
signs all of his own legal documentation as a party proceeding in pro se.
15
The court’s current address of record for Plaintiff is: Kern Valley State Prison, P.O.
16
Box 5107, Delano, CA 93216. (Court Record.) There is no evidence that Plaintiff was
17
released from custody. Therefore, the Clerk of Court shall be directed to send Plaintiff a
18
change-of-address form. Plaintiff is required to complete and return the form to the court
19
within fourteen (14) days, notifying the court of his address of actual residence. Plaintiff is
20
cautioned that pro se litigants are required to notify the Clerk and all other parties of any
21
change of address, and absent such notice, service of documents at the prior address of the
22
party shall be fully effective. See Local Rule 182(f). Moreover, Plaintiff=s failure to comply
23
with an order or any Local Rule may be grounds for dismissal of the entire action. See Local
24
Rule 110.
25
III.
CONCLUSION
26
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1.
28
Plaintiff’s request to change his address of record at the court to his sister’s
street address, filed on September 16, 2017, is DENIED;
2
1
2.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a change-of-address form;
2
3.
Within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff is
3
required to file a new notice of change of address, notifying the court of his
4
address of actual residence; and
5
4.
6
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order shall result in a recommendation that
this action be dismissed.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 21, 2017
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?