Mendez v. The Procter & Gamble Company

Filing 17

ORDER to the PARTIES and COUNSEL to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for Their Failure to Comply with the Court's Orders, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/31/2018. Show Cause Response due within 7 days. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY MENDEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, 15 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01170-DAD-JLT ORDER TO THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS 16 17 On August 3, 2018, the plaintiff notified the Court that the parties had resolved the matter and 18 were finalizing settlement documents. (Doc. 15 at 2) The Court then ordered the parties to file the 19 stipulated dismissal by August 27, 2018. (Doc. 16) This has not occurred. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 20 1. Within seven days, the parties and their attorneys SHALL show cause in writing why 21 sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court’s order. Alternatively, they 22 may file the stipulated dismissal within seven days. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 31, 2018 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?