Mendez v. The Procter & Gamble Company
Filing
17
ORDER to the PARTIES and COUNSEL to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for Their Failure to Comply with the Court's Orders, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/31/2018. Show Cause Response due within 7 days. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY MENDEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY,
15
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:17-cv-01170-DAD-JLT
ORDER TO THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD
NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS
16
17
On August 3, 2018, the plaintiff notified the Court that the parties had resolved the matter and
18
were finalizing settlement documents. (Doc. 15 at 2) The Court then ordered the parties to file the
19
stipulated dismissal by August 27, 2018. (Doc. 16) This has not occurred. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
20
1.
Within seven days, the parties and their attorneys SHALL show cause in writing why
21
sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court’s order. Alternatively, they
22
may file the stipulated dismissal within seven days.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 31, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?