Mendez v. The Procter & Gamble Company

Filing 21

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THIS ACTION (STIPULATION),signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/2/18. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY MENDEZ,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

v.
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY,

15

Defendant.

16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:17-cv-1170-DAD- JLT
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE
THE ACTION
(Doc. 20)

18

On September 28, 2018, the parties filed a “Stipulation of Dismissal,” indicating the parties

19

agreed that the action is “dismissed, with prejudice.” (Doc. 20 at 2, emphasis omitted) Pursuant to

20

Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a

21

stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.”

22

Because all parties signed the stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v.

23

City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based

24

upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 2, 2018

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE