Golden Gate Salmon Association, et al. v. Ross, et al.

Filing 27

ORDER SETTING an Initial Scheduling Conference for 10/3/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/5/2017. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

GOLDEN GATE SALMON
ASSOCIATION, ET AL.,
Plaintiff(s),
v.

Case No. 1:17-CV-01172 LJO-EPG
ORDER SETTING MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
DATE: October 3, 2017
TIME: 9:00 A.M.

WILBUR ROSS, ET AL.,
Defendant(s).

COURTROOM: 10 (6th Floor)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

18
19

The Court sets a formal Scheduling Conference before United States Magistrate Judge

20

Erica P. Grosjean, in Courtroom 10 at the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno,

21

CA 93721, to be held on October 3, 2017, at 9:00 AM.

22

Appearance at Scheduling Conference

23

Attendance at the Scheduling Conference is mandatory for all parties. Parties may appear

24

by their counsel, if represented. If a party is not represented by counsel, they must appear

25

personally at the Scheduling Conference. Telephonic appearances are not available for pro se

26

parties, i.e., those not represented by counsel. Trial counsel should participate in this Scheduling

27

Conference whenever possible. If one or more parties are represented by counsel and wish to

28
1

1

appear telephonically, counsel shall email Michelle Means Rooney, Courtroom Deputy Clerk, at

2

[e-mail], sufficiently in advance of the conference so that a notation can be

3

placed on the court calendar. To appear telephonically, each party shall dial 1 (888) 251 − 2909

4

and enter access code 1024453. Additionally, counsel are directed to indicate on the face page of

5

their Joint Scheduling Report that the conference will be telephonic.

6

Joint Scheduling Report

7

A Joint Scheduling Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be

8

electronically filed in CM/ECF, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference and shall be

9

emailed in Word format to [e-mail]. The Joint Scheduling Report shall

10

indicate the date, time, and courtroom of the Scheduling Conference. This information is to be

11

placed opposite the caption on the first page of the Report.

12

At least twenty (20) days prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, trial counsel for

13

all parties shall conduct a conference at a mutually agreed upon time and place. This should

14

preferably be a personal conference between all counsel but a telephonic conference call

15

involving all counsel/pro se parties is permissible. The Joint Scheduling Report shall contain the

16

following items by corresponding numbered paragraphs:

17
18

1.

Summary of the factual and legal contentions set forth in the pleadings of each

party, including the relief sought by any party presently before the Court.

19

2.

Summary of major disputed facts and contentions of law.

20

3.

A proposed deadline for amendments to pleadings. Any proposed amendment to

21

the pleadings shall be referenced in the Scheduling Conference Report. If the matter cannot be

22

resolved at the Scheduling Conference, the moving party shall file a motion to amend in

23

accordance with the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California.

24
25

4.

The status of all matters which are presently set before the Court, e.g., hearings of

motions, etc.

26

5.

27

proposed dates:

28

a

A complete and detailed discovery plan addressing the following issues and

A date for the exchange of initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P.
2

1
2

26(a)(1) or a statement that disclosures have already been exchanged;
b.

A firm cut-off date for non-expert discovery. When setting this date, the

3

parties should consider that discovery cutoffs requires that motions to

4

compel be filed and heard sufficiently in advance of the deadline so that the

5

Court may grant effective relief within the allotted discovery time;

6

c.

7

A firm date for disclosure of expert witnesses, required by Fed. R. Civ. P.
26(a)(2), including a date for disclosure of rebuttal experts;

8

d.

A firm cut-off date for all expert witness discovery;

9

e.

Any proposed changes in the limits on discovery imposed by

10
11

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b); 30(a)(2)(A), (B); 30(d); or 33(a);
f.

Whether the parties anticipate the need for a protective order relating to the

12

discovery of information relating to a trade secret or other confidential

13

research, development, or commercial information;

14

g.

15
16

Any issues or proposals relating to the timing, sequencing, phasing or
scheduling of discovery; and

h.

17

Whether the parties anticipate the need to take discovery outside the United
States and, if so, a description of the proposed discovery.

18

Additional Disclosures Related to Electronic Discovery

19

1.

Discovery Relating to Electronic, Digital and/or Magnetic Data. Prior to a

20

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, counsel should carefully investigate their respective

21

client’s information management system so that they are knowledgeable as to its

22

operation, including how information is stored and how it can be retrieved. Counsel shall

23

also conduct a reasonable review of their respective client’s computer files to ascertain the

24

contents thereof, including archival and legacy data (outdated formats or media), and

25

disclose in initial discovery (self-executing routine discovery) the computer-based

26

evidence which may be used to support claims or defenses.

27
28

2.

The parties shall meet and confer regarding the following matters during

the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, and address the status of Electronic Discovery and
3

1

any disagreements in their Statement, including:

2

a.

3

parties will take to segregate and preserve computer-based

4

information in order to avoid accusations of spoliation.

5

b.

6

agree as to the scope of e-mail discovery and attempt to agree upon

7

an e-mail search protocol. The parties should seek to agree on

8

search terms, custodians, and date ranges in advance of the

9

Conference so that any disputes can be addressed at the Conference.

Preservation: The parties shall attempt to agree on steps the

Scope of E-mail Discovery: The parties shall attempt to

10

c.

11

parties should confer regarding procedures for inadvertent

12

production of privileged electronic material, including any

13

obligations to notify the other party, and procedures for bringing

14

any disputes promptly to the Court.

15

d.

16

or not restoration of deleted information may be necessary, the

17

extent to which restoration of deleted information is needed, and

18

who will bear the costs of restoration; and the parties shall attempt

19

to agree whether or not back-up data may be necessary, the extent

20

to which backup data is needed and who will bear the cost of

21

obtaining back-up data.

22
23

6.

Inadvertent Production of Privileged Information: The

Data Restoration: The parties shall confer regarding whether

Dates agreed to by all counsel for:
a.

Filing dispositive pre-trial motions (except motions in limine or other trial

24

motions). The dispositive motion filing deadline shall be at least twelve

25

(12) weeks prior to the proposed Pre-Trial Conference date, and the

26

hearing on dispositive motions shall be at least sixty (60) days before the

27

proposed Pre-trial Conference date.

28

b.

A Pre-Trial Conference Date.
4

1

c.

2
3

A Trial date. This date should be at least sixty (60) days after the proposed
Pre-Trial Conference date.

7.

The parties are encouraged to discuss settlement, and must include a statement in

4

the Joint Scheduling Report as to the possibility of settlement. The parties shall indicate when

5

they desire a settlement conference, e.g., before further discovery, after discovery, after pre-trial

6

motions, etc. Among other things, counsel will be expected to discuss the possibility of settlement

7

at the Scheduling Conference. Note that, even if settlement negotiations are progressing, counsel

8

are expected to comply with the requirements of this Order unless otherwise excused by the

9

Court. If the entire case is settled, counsel shall promptly inform the Court. In the event of

10

settlement, counsel's presence at the conference, as well as the Joint Scheduling Report, will not

11

be required.

12

8.

A statement as to whether the case is a jury or non-jury case. The parties shall

13

briefly outline their respective positions if there is a disagreement as to whether a jury trial has

14

been timely demanded, or as to whether a jury trial is available on some or all of the claims.

15
16
17

9.

An estimate of the number of trial days is required. If the parties cannot agree,

each party shall give his or her best estimate.
10.

The parties' position regarding consent to proceed before a United States

18

magistrate judge. Note that the parties need not make a final decision on the issue of consent

19

until after the Scheduling Conference, but should state their current position in this Statement and

20

expect to make a final decision soon after the Scheduling Conference.

21

The parties may wish to consider that, when a civil trial is set before the district judges in

22

the Fresno Division, any criminal trial that conflicts with the civil trial will take priority, even if

23

the civil trial was set first. Continuances of civil trials under these circumstances may no longer

24

be entertained, absent good cause, but the civil trial may instead trail from day to day or week to

25

week until the completion of either the criminal case or the older civil case.

26
27
28

Parties are free to withhold consent or decline magistrate jurisdiction without adverse
substantive consequences.
11.

Whether either party requests bifurcation or phasing of trial or has any other
5

1

suggestion for shortening or expediting discovery, pre-trial motions or trial.

2

12.

Whether this matter is related to any matter pending in this court or any other

3

court, including bankruptcy court.

4

Scheduling Order

5

Following the Scheduling Conference, the Court will issue a Scheduling Order with the

6

benefit of the input of the parties. Once issued, the dates in the Scheduling Order shall be firm

7

and no extension shall be given without permission from the Court.

8

Lack of Participation in the Joint Scheduling Report

9

If any party fails to participate in the preparation of the Joint Scheduling Report, the non-

10

offending party shall detail the party’s effort to get the offending party to participate in the Joint

11

Scheduling Report. The non-offending party shall still file the report one (1) full week prior to

12

the Mandatory Scheduling Conference and shall list the non-offending party’s position on the

13

listed issues and proposed dates for a schedule. Absent good cause, the dates proposed by the

14

non-offending party will be presumed to be the dates offered by the parties. The offending party

15

may be subject to sanctions, including monetary sanctions to compensate the non-offending

16

party’s time and effort incurred in seeking compliance with this Scheduling Order.

17

Important Chambers' Information

18

The parties are directed to the Court’s website at www.caed.uscourts.gov under Judges;

19

Grosjean (EPG); Standard Information (in the area entitled “Case Management

20

Procedures”) for specific information regarding Chambers’ procedures. Information about law

21

and motion, scheduling conferences, telephonic appearances, and discovery disputes is provided

22

at this link.

23

Sanctions for Failure to Comply

24

Should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to appear at the Mandatory Scheduling

25

Conference, or fail to comply with the directions as set forth above, an ex parte hearing may be

26

held and contempt sanctions, including monetary sanctions, dismissal, default, or other

27

appropriate judgment, may be imposed and/or ordered.

28

///
6

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4

DATED: September 5, 2017

/s/ ERICA P. GROSJEAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7