Bay.org et al v. Zinke et al

Filing 106

ORDER RE REQUEST TO STAY CASE FOR 30 DAYS signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on May 3, 2019. (ECF NO. 105) (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 Plaintiffs, 4 5 Case No. 1: 17-cv-01176-LJO-EPG BAY.ORG, et al., ORDER RE REQUEST TO STAY CASE FOR 30 DAYS (ECF NO. 105) v. 6 DAVID BERNHARDT, et al., 7 Defendants, 8 9 and STATE WATER CONTRACTORS, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. 10 11 12 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for an Immediate Stay of 13 Proceedings for 30 Days. Plaintiffs request a stay of proceedings, including the deadlines set forth in 14 the Court’s January 31, 2019 Order [ECF No. 86], as amended by the Court’s March 11, 2019 Order 15 [ECF No. 96], in light of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and California Department of Water 16 Resources’ letter formally withdrawing their Biological Assessment for the proposed WaterFix 17 project and requesting that the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service withdraw its Biological Opinion issued 18 under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that 19 Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion is GRANTED. The parties shall file with the Court a joint status report 20 on or before May 24, 2019, reflecting their respective positions on (i) Plaintiffs’ pending claim and 21 (ii) how the Court should proceed procedurally with this lawsuit. If the parties cannot agree to a joint 22 status report, the parties shall file separate status reports. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 3, 2019 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?