Bay.org et al v. Zinke et al
Filing
106
ORDER RE REQUEST TO STAY CASE FOR 30 DAYS signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on May 3, 2019. (ECF NO. 105) (Munoz, I)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
Plaintiffs,
4
5
Case No. 1: 17-cv-01176-LJO-EPG
BAY.ORG, et al.,
ORDER RE REQUEST TO STAY CASE
FOR 30 DAYS (ECF NO. 105)
v.
6
DAVID BERNHARDT, et al.,
7
Defendants,
8
9
and
STATE WATER CONTRACTORS, et al.,
Defendant-Intervenors.
10
11
12
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for an Immediate Stay of
13
Proceedings for 30 Days. Plaintiffs request a stay of proceedings, including the deadlines set forth in
14
the Court’s January 31, 2019 Order [ECF No. 86], as amended by the Court’s March 11, 2019 Order
15
[ECF No. 96], in light of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and California Department of Water
16
Resources’ letter formally withdrawing their Biological Assessment for the proposed WaterFix
17
project and requesting that the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service withdraw its Biological Opinion issued
18
under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that
19
Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion is GRANTED. The parties shall file with the Court a joint status report
20
on or before May 24, 2019, reflecting their respective positions on (i) Plaintiffs’ pending claim and
21
(ii) how the Court should proceed procedurally with this lawsuit. If the parties cannot agree to a joint
22
status report, the parties shall file separate status reports.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 3, 2019
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?