Hughson Nut, Inc. v. The Kroger Co.

Filing 11

ORDER re AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/12/2018. (Kusamura, W)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

HUGHSON NUT, INC.,

Case No. 1:17-cv-1178-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff,

12

ORDER RE AGREED PROTECTIVE
ORDER

v.

13

(ECF No. 10)
14

THE KROGER CO.,
Defendant.

15
16

On March 9, 2018, the parties filed an agreed protective order. (ECF No. 10.) The

17

18 parties seek for the Court to retain jurisdiction after the termination of this action to enforce the
19 terms of the agreed protective order. However, the Court declines to retain jurisdiction without a
20 showing of good cause, including why the parties are without an enforcement mechanism absent
21 this Court retaining jurisdiction. The Court shall approve the agreed protective order with the
22 exception of the term that the Court retain jurisdiction upon termination of the action to enforce
23 the terms of the order.
Accordingly, pursuant to the agreement of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

24
25
26

that:
1.

to retain jurisdiction upon the termination of the action;

27
28

The protective order is approved with the exception that the Court declines

2.

The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States

1

1

District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents which are to be

2

filed under seal will require a written request which complies with Local

3

Rule 141; and
3.

4

The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to

5

show good cause for documents attached to a nondispositive motion or

6

compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v.

7

Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009).

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 Dated:

March 12, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2