Hughson Nut, Inc. v. The Kroger Co.
ORDER re AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/12/2018. (Kusamura, W)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HUGHSON NUT, INC.,
Case No. 1:17-cv-1178-DAD-SAB
ORDER RE AGREED PROTECTIVE
(ECF No. 10)
THE KROGER CO.,
On March 9, 2018, the parties filed an agreed protective order. (ECF No. 10.) The
18 parties seek for the Court to retain jurisdiction after the termination of this action to enforce the
19 terms of the agreed protective order. However, the Court declines to retain jurisdiction without a
20 showing of good cause, including why the parties are without an enforcement mechanism absent
21 this Court retaining jurisdiction. The Court shall approve the agreed protective order with the
22 exception of the term that the Court retain jurisdiction upon termination of the action to enforce
23 the terms of the order.
Accordingly, pursuant to the agreement of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
to retain jurisdiction upon the termination of the action;
The protective order is approved with the exception that the Court declines
The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States
District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents which are to be
filed under seal will require a written request which complies with Local
Rule 141; and
The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to
show good cause for documents attached to a nondispositive motion or
compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v.
Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 12, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?