Hughson Nut, Inc. v. The Kroger Co.

Filing 11

ORDER re AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/12/2018. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HUGHSON NUT, INC., Case No. 1:17-cv-1178-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, 12 ORDER RE AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER v. 13 (ECF No. 10) 14 THE KROGER CO., Defendant. 15 16 On March 9, 2018, the parties filed an agreed protective order. (ECF No. 10.) The 17 18 parties seek for the Court to retain jurisdiction after the termination of this action to enforce the 19 terms of the agreed protective order. However, the Court declines to retain jurisdiction without a 20 showing of good cause, including why the parties are without an enforcement mechanism absent 21 this Court retaining jurisdiction. The Court shall approve the agreed protective order with the 22 exception of the term that the Court retain jurisdiction upon termination of the action to enforce 23 the terms of the order. Accordingly, pursuant to the agreement of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 24 25 26 that: 1. to retain jurisdiction upon the termination of the action; 27 28 The protective order is approved with the exception that the Court declines 2. The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States 1 1 District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents which are to be 2 filed under seal will require a written request which complies with Local 3 Rule 141; and 3. 4 The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to 5 show good cause for documents attached to a nondispositive motion or 6 compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v. 7 Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: March 12, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?