Dotson v. Adams et al
Filing
24
ORDER re Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint and ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Update Docket to Reflect Voluntary Dismissal of Certain Defendants signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/14/2018. Response to First Amended Complaint due by 1/7/2019. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517
Attorney General of California
CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER, State Bar No. 230529
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
KELLY A. SAMSON, State Bar No. 266927
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 210-7317
Fax: (916) 324-5205
E-mail: Kelly.Samson@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
Myers, Neumann, Kanan, Cornish, Adams,
California Correctional Health Care Services,
Singh, California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation, Kernan, Diaz, Mitchell, Fontanilla,
Carrick, Hutchinson, and Ralston
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
FRESNO DIVISION
13
14
15
EDWINA DOTSON,
1:17-cv-01199 AWI-BAM
16
17
Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
v.
18
19
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF
COURT TO UPDATE DOCKET TO
REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL
HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al.,
20
Defendants.
21
22
In exchange for waivers of service for the newly named Defendants, California
23
Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS), California Department of Corrections and
24
Rehabilitation (CDCR), Dr. Carrick, Secretary Diaz1, and Kelso, the parties have stipulated to
25
extend the responsive pleading deadline for all Defendants until January 7, 2019.
26
27
28
1
Effective September 1, 2018, Secretary Diaz has assumed the position as Acting
Secretary of CDCR. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d) Secretary Diaz is automatically
substituted in Secretary Kernan’s place in this official capacity lawsuit.
1
1
The parties further stipulate that the parties who have been omitted from the First Amended
2
Complaint, are dismissed without prejudice, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
3
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), including Defendants Myers, Neumann, Kanan, Cornish, Adams, Singh, Mitchell,
4
Fontanilla, Hutchinson, and Ralston.
5
6
Based on these stipulations, the parties request that the Clerk terminate these omitted
Defendants, as well as Secretary Kernan, from the docket.
7
8
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: November 13, 2018
/s/ Kelli A. Samson
.
Kelly A. Samson
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
Myers, Neumann, Kanan, Cornish, Adams,
CCHCS, Singh, CDCR, Kernan, Diaz,
Mitchell, Fontanilla, Carrick, Hutchinson,
and Ralston
Dated: November 9, 2018
/s/ Martin H. Dodd
.
Martin H. Dodd
Futterman Dupree Dodd Croley Maier LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Kelso
Dated: November 12, 2018
/s/ Kevin Love Hubbard
Kevin Love Hubbard
Medina Orthwein LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Dotson
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
.
20
21
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
22
23
ORDERED that:
24
1.
Defendants California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS), California
25
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), Deputy Medical Exec. Dr. Jeffrey
26
Carrick, CDCR Secretary Ralph Diaz, and Federal Receiver J. Clark Kelso shall file a response to
27
the First Amended Complaint on or before January 7, 2019;
28
///
2
1
2
3
4
2.
All other defendants are dismissed, without prejudice, by operation of law without
further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); and
3.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket to reflect the foregoing, and
to update the caption of this case as shown above.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
November 14, 2018
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?