Dotson v. Adams et al

Filing 24

ORDER re Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint and ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Update Docket to Reflect Voluntary Dismissal of Certain Defendants signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/14/2018. Response to First Amended Complaint due by 1/7/2019. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER, State Bar No. 230529 Supervising Deputy Attorney General KELLY A. SAMSON, State Bar No. 266927 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-7317 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Kelly.Samson@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants Myers, Neumann, Kanan, Cornish, Adams, California Correctional Health Care Services, Singh, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kernan, Diaz, Mitchell, Fontanilla, Carrick, Hutchinson, and Ralston 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 FRESNO DIVISION 13 14 15 EDWINA DOTSON, 1:17-cv-01199 AWI-BAM 16 17 Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT v. 18 19 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO UPDATE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al., 20 Defendants. 21 22 In exchange for waivers of service for the newly named Defendants, California 23 Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS), California Department of Corrections and 24 Rehabilitation (CDCR), Dr. Carrick, Secretary Diaz1, and Kelso, the parties have stipulated to 25 extend the responsive pleading deadline for all Defendants until January 7, 2019. 26 27 28 1 Effective September 1, 2018, Secretary Diaz has assumed the position as Acting Secretary of CDCR. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d) Secretary Diaz is automatically substituted in Secretary Kernan’s place in this official capacity lawsuit. 1 1 The parties further stipulate that the parties who have been omitted from the First Amended 2 Complaint, are dismissed without prejudice, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 3 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), including Defendants Myers, Neumann, Kanan, Cornish, Adams, Singh, Mitchell, 4 Fontanilla, Hutchinson, and Ralston. 5 6 Based on these stipulations, the parties request that the Clerk terminate these omitted Defendants, as well as Secretary Kernan, from the docket. 7 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: November 13, 2018 /s/ Kelli A. Samson . Kelly A. Samson Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Myers, Neumann, Kanan, Cornish, Adams, CCHCS, Singh, CDCR, Kernan, Diaz, Mitchell, Fontanilla, Carrick, Hutchinson, and Ralston Dated: November 9, 2018 /s/ Martin H. Dodd . Martin H. Dodd Futterman Dupree Dodd Croley Maier LLP Attorneys for Defendant Kelso Dated: November 12, 2018 /s/ Kevin Love Hubbard Kevin Love Hubbard Medina Orthwein LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Dotson 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 . 20 21 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 22 23 ORDERED that: 24 1. Defendants California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS), California 25 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), Deputy Medical Exec. Dr. Jeffrey 26 Carrick, CDCR Secretary Ralph Diaz, and Federal Receiver J. Clark Kelso shall file a response to 27 the First Amended Complaint on or before January 7, 2019; 28 /// 2 1 2 3 4 2. All other defendants are dismissed, without prejudice, by operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket to reflect the foregoing, and to update the caption of this case as shown above. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara November 14, 2018 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?