Dotson v. Adams et al

Filing 42

ORDER Regarding Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Carrick With Prejudice Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/10/19. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

EDDIE DOTSON (AKA EDWINA
DOTSON),
Plaintiff,

8
9
10
11

v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT CARRICK WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
(ECF No. 41)

Defendants.

12
13

Case No. 1:17-cv-01199-AWI-BAM (PC)

On May 7, 2019, Plaintiff Eddie Dotson aka Edwina Dotson and Defendants California

14

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Correctional Health Care Services,

15

Jeffrey Carrick, and Ralph Diaz filed a stipulation to dismiss Defendant Carrick from this action

16

with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 41.) The

17

stipulation is signed and dated by counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for all Defendants who have

18

appeared in the action.

19

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Carrick are terminated by operation of

20

law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San

21

Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate

22

Defendant Carrick from this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

May 10, 2019

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1