Dotson v. Adams et al

Filing 45

ORDER Regarding Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/19/2019. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 EDDIE DOTSON (AKA EDWINA DOTSON), Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (ECF No. 44) Defendants. 12 13 Case No. 1:17-cv-01199-AWI-BAM (PC) On September 17, 2019, Plaintiff Eddie Dotson aka Edwina Dotson and Defendants 14 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Correctional Health Care 15 Services, and Ralph Diaz filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action, with prejudice, pursuant 16 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 44.) The stipulation states that each 17 party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. Finally, the stipulation is signed and 18 dated by counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for all Defendants. 19 Accordingly, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the 20 Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 21 1997). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara September 19, 2019 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?