Dotson v. Adams et al
Filing
45
ORDER Regarding Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/19/2019. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
EDDIE DOTSON (AKA EDWINA
DOTSON),
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
(ECF No. 44)
Defendants.
12
13
Case No. 1:17-cv-01199-AWI-BAM (PC)
On September 17, 2019, Plaintiff Eddie Dotson aka Edwina Dotson and Defendants
14
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Correctional Health Care
15
Services, and Ralph Diaz filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action, with prejudice, pursuant
16
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 44.) The stipulation states that each
17
party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. Finally, the stipulation is signed and
18
dated by counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for all Defendants.
19
Accordingly, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the
20
Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir.
21
1997). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
September 19, 2019
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?