Whitehead v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al

Filing 18

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/11/2017. Initial Disclosures 12/18/2017. Administrative Record Deadlines: Filing 1/8/2018; Objections/Motions to Supplement 1/24/2018. Discovery Cut-Off 4/2/2018. Briefing Deadlines: Opening Briefs 4/16/2018; Oppositions 5/14/2018; Reply Briefs 6/4/2018; Hearing set for 7/31/2018 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Mediation Deadline 3/30/2018. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY )
)
OF BOSTON,
)
)
Defendant.
)

1:17-CV-01204- LJO- JLT

KIMBERLY WHITEHEAD,

SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Initial disclosures: 12/18/2017
Administrative Record Deadlines:
Filing: 1/8/2018
Objections/motions to supplement:
1/24/2018

16
Discovery Cut-Off: 4/2/2018
17
Briefing Deadlines:
Opening briefs: 4/16/2018
Oppositions: 5/14/2018
Reply briefs: 6/4/2018
Hearing: 7/31/2018 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4

18
19
20
21

Mediation deadline: 3/30/2018

22

23
24
25

I.

Information Concerning the Court’s Schedule
Out of fairness, the Court believes it is necessary to forewarn litigants that the Fresno Division

26

of the Eastern District of California now has the heaviest District Court Judge caseload in the entire

27

nation. While the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this case and all other civil cases in a timely

28

manner, the parties are admonished that not all of the parties’ needs and expectations may be met as
1

1

expeditiously as desired. As multiple trials are now being set to begin upon the same date, parties may

2

find their case trailing with little notice before the trial begins. The law requires that the Court give any

3

criminal trial priority over civil trials or any other matter. The Court must proceed with a criminal trial

4

even if a civil trial was filed earlier and set for trial first. Continuances of any civil trial under these

5

circumstances will no longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated finding of good cause. All

6

parties should be informed that any civil trial set to begin during the time a criminal trial is proceeding

7

will trail the completion of the criminal trial.

8

The parties are reminded of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all

9

proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to conduct trials, including

10

entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73,

11

and Local Rule 305. The same jury pool is used by both United States Magistrate Judges and United

12

States District Court Judges. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States Magistrate Judge

13

is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. However, the parties are

14

hereby informed that no substantive rulings or decisions will be affected by whether a party chooses to

15

consent.

16

Finally, the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing

17

United States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant

18

to the Local Rules, Appendix A, reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

19

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

20

District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

21
22

conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel

23

SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating

24

whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

25

II.

The parties agree no pleading amendments will occur.

26
27
28

Pleading Amendment Deadline

III.

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
2

1

on or before December 18, 2017.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining on or before April 2, 2018.

2
3

IV.

Administrative record
Defendant SHALL file the administrative record no later than January 8, 2018. Defendants

4
5

need not provide a courtesy paper copy but SHALL provide a searchable electronic copy to the

6

chambers of Judge O’Neill. Moreover, the parties SHALL file excerpts of the record in connection

7

with their motion/cross motion for summary judgment.
Objections or a motion to supplement the record SHALL be filed no later than January 24,

8
9

2018, and heard no later than February 21, 2018.

10

No objections or motion to supplement shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

11

Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff SHALL confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve the

12

issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, Plaintiff promptly SHALL seek a telephonic

13

hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It is the obligation of Plaintiff to arrange

14

and originate the conference call to the Court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are

15

ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at

16

[e-mail].

17

V.

18

Briefing Schedule
Prior to filing the cross motions for summary judgment the parties are ORDERED to meet, in

19

person or by telephone, and confer to discuss the issues to be raised in the motion at least 21 days

20

prior to the filing of the motion. The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) determine whether the

21

respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole or in part; 2) discuss whether issues can be

22

resolved without the necessity of briefing; 3) narrow the issues for review by the court; 4) explore the

23

possibility of settlement before the parties incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion;

24

5) to arrive at a joint statement of undisputed facts.

25

In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the parties SHALL file a joint statement of

26

undisputed facts and each party SHALL file excerpts of the record which are cited in each party’s

27

briefs. The parties are strongly urged to file a joint excerpt.

28

In the notice of motion, the moving parties SHALL certify that they have met and conferred as
3

1

ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.
The parties’ opening briefs on the cross motions for summary judgment SHALL be filed no

2
3

later than April 16, 2018, and oppositions to the motion SHALL be filed no later than May 14, 2018.

4

Any briefs in reply SHALL be filed no later than June 4, 2018. The hearing on the cross motions is

5

SET for July 31, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before the Honorable Lawrence O’Neill, United

6

States District Court Judge.1

7

VI.

The parties do not seek a settlement conference at this time, and intend to pursue private

8
9
10
11

Mediation

mediation which SHALL be completed no later than March 30, 2018.
VII.

Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

12

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

13

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

14

handle its increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal

15

Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

16

VIII. Effect of this Order

17

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

18

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

19

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

20

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

21

subsequent status conference.

22

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

23

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

24

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

25

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

26

for granting the relief requested.

27
1

28

Because the parties believe the matter will be resolve on dispositive motion, the Court does not set a pretrial
conference or trial date.

4

1

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

2
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

December 11, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28
5