Peckler v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 8 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Sixth Cause of Action for Violation of the Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA") signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/5/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:17-cv-1206-BAM
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR
VIOLATION OF THE PRIVATE
ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT (“PAGA”)
ULTA SALON, COSMETICS &
(Docs. 8, 12).
Plaintiff Layla Peckler (“Plaintiff”) filed this wage and hour claim against Defendant Ulta
Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. (“Ulta” or “Defendant”) on July 28, 2017. (Doc. 1). Thereafter,
the parties consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge and the action was
reassigned to the Honorable Barbara A. McAuliffe for all purposes. See (Docs. 7, 10); 28 U.S.C.§
636(c); Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; see also L.R. 301, 305.
Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s sixth cause of action
for violation of the Private Attorneys’ General Act (“PAGA”) on the ground that the claim is time-
barred by the applicable one-year statute of limitations. Code Civ. Proc. § 340(a). On September 29,
2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of non-opposition to the motion. (Doc. 12). In light of Plaintiff’s non-
opposition and having considered the motion and the entire file, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Sixth Cause of Action in the First Amended Complaint for violation of the Private
Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) is GRANTED. The Sixth Cause of Action in the First Amended
Complaint for violation of the Private Attorneys General Act is dismissed with prejudice. The hearing
set for October 17, 2017 is VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 5, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?