Anderson v. Pfeiffer
Filing
3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/14/2017. New Case Number 2:17-cv-01917-AC (HC). Old Case Number 1:17-cv-01233-MJS (HC). (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
1:17-cv-01233-MJS (HC)
DION ANDERSON,
Petitioner,
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
v.
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER,
Respondent.
16
17
18
19
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas corpus action
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915.
20
The petitioner is challenging a conviction from Sacramento County, which is part
21
of the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
22
California. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the Sacramento Division.
23
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in
24
the proper court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court.
25
Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. Good cause
26
appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern
28
1
1
2
3
District of California sitting in Sacramento; and
2. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned
and shall be filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
4
5
6
7
3. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 14, 2017
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?