Real v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER to EXTEND time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief on or before August 15, 2018 and Plaintiff shall file any reply on or before September 4, 2018. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/17/2018. (Timken, A)
1
7
MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
SHARON LAHEY
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: 415-977-8963
Facsimile: 415-744-0134
E-mail: Sharon.Lahey@ssa.gov
8
Attorneys for DEFENDANT
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
FRESNO DIVISION
13
14
JEREMY LEWIS REAL,
15
Plaintiff,
16
vs.
17
18
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:17-cv-01234-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S OPENING
BRIEF
(Doc. 16)
20
21
Jeremy Lewis Real, and NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Of Social
22
Security (Defendant or the Commissioner), hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court,
23
to a 30-day extension of time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Opening Brief (Docket
24
Number 15). The current deadline is July 16, 2018, and the new deadline would be August 15,
25
2018. Any reply to the Commissioner’s response would be due on or before September 4, 2018.
26
This is the second extension of time requested in the above-captioned matter. Defendant
27
requests this additional time due to unanticipated medical leave from the office.
28
////
1
2
The parties further stipulate that the scheduling order in the above-captioned matter be
modified accordingly.
3
Respectfully submitted,
4
NEWEL LAW
5
6
Dated: July 16, 2018
By: /s/ Melissa Newel*
MELISSA NEWEL
Attorney for Plaintiff
[*As authorized by e-mail on July 13, 2018]
Dated: July 16, 2018
MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
By:
/s/ Sharon Lahey
SHARON LAHEY
Assistant Regional Counsel
14
15
16
ORDER
17
The Court is in receipt of the parties’ above “Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond
18
to Plaintiff’s Opening Brief.” (Doc. 16). Plaintiff submitted his Opening Brief on June 15, 2018 (Doc.
19
15) and pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order (Doc. 5), Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Opening
20
Brief was due July 16, 2018, the same day on which the parties filed the present request for extension.
21
Requests for extension are governed by Rule 144 of the Local Rules of the United States District
22
Court, Eastern District of California (“Local Rules”). Local Rule 144(d) explains that “[r]equests for
23
Court-approved extensions brought on the required filing date for the pleading or other document are
24
looked upon with disfavor.” Given defense counsel’s representation that she was recently required to take
25
unanticipated medical leave from the office, (see Doc. 16 at 1), and the fact that Plaintiff consents to the
26
request, the Court GRANTS the parties’ request for an extension.
27
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff’s Opening Brief on or before
August 15, 2018 and Plaintiff shall file any reply on or before September 4, 2018.
2
1
2
3
The parties are hereby ADMONISHED that any future requests for extension of time shall be
brought in advance of the required filing date and be supported by good cause under Fed. R. Civ. P.
16(b)(4).
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 17, 2018
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?