Frank Wells v. Gonzales
Filing
81
ORDER GRANTING 76 Plaintiff's Motion for Mediation and Denying Plaintiff's Request for Counsel at the Mediation signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/5/2020. 7-day deadline. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
FRANK WELLS,
9
10
v.
11
12
Case No. 1:17-cv-01240-DAD-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR MEDIATION AND
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
COUNSEL AT THE MEDIATION
ROSA GONZALES,
(ECF NO. 76)
Defendant. SEVEN (7) DAY DEADLINE
13
14
15
16
17
Frank Wells (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
civil rights action.
On January 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for mediation. (ECF No. 76). Plaintiff also
18
asks that, if his request for mediation is granted, he be appointed pro bono counsel for the
19
mediation. On February 4, 2020, Defendant filed her response, indicating that she is open to
20
mediation. (ECF No. 80).
21
Given Defendant’s response, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion for mediation.
22
However, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s request for appointment of pro bono counsel for the
23
mediation. Plaintiff did not provide any reasons why counsel should be appointed. Additionally,
24
the Court has reviewed the record in this case, and it appears that Plaintiff can adequately
25
articulate his claims.
26
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
27
1. Plaintiff’s motion for mediation is GRANTED;
28
2. Defense counsel has seven days from the date of service of this order to contact
1
1
ADR Coordinator Sujean Park (spark@caed.uscourts.gov) to schedule a settlement
2
conference; and
3
3. Plaintiff’s request for appointment of pro bono counsel for the mediation is DENIED.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 5, 2020
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?