Rossy et al v. City of Bishop et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Scheduling Conference from 2/6/2018 to 4/24/2018 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. A Joint Scheduling Conference Report is due one week before the new conference date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/17/2018. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
Robert L. Baumann, SBN 261665
rbaumann@adamsferrone.com
Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone APC
4333 Park Terrace Drive, Suite 200
Westlake Village, CA 91361
Telephone: 805-373-5900
Facsimile: 818-874-1382
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
BRYAN ROSSY, et al.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Scott J. Grossberg (Bar No. 123359)
sgrossberg@grossberghoehn.com
Laurel A. Hoehn (Bar No. 232946)
lhoehn@grossberghoehn.com
GROSSBERG & HOEHN
1026 W. Foothill Blvd.
Upland, CA 91786
(909) 483-1850/Phone
(909) 483-1840/Fax
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF BISHOP, et al.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRYAN ROSSY, MARK
)
GUTIERREZ, JARED WAASDORP, )
and DOUGLAS MAIRS,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF BISHOP, a public agency
)
and/or municipal corporation; CHRIS )
CARTER, individually and as Police )
Chief; TED STEC, individually and as )
Police Chief; JIM TATUM,
)
individually; PAT GARDNER,
)
individually; and DOES 1 THROUGH )
10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1
Case No. 1:17-cv-01244-LJO-SAB
JOINT STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE; ORDER
Plaintiffs Bryan Rossy, et al. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants City
1
2
of Bishop, et al. (collectively “Defendants”) by and through their counsel of
3
record, hereby request a continuance of the Scheduling Conference.
4
On September 18, 2017, the Court issued an order setting a Scheduling
5
Conference on December 4, 2017 at 2:15 p.m., which was subsequently continued
6
after Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Continue the Scheduling Conference on
7
November 22, 2017. The Court granted the motion on November 27, 2017,
8
continuing the Scheduling Conference to February 6, 2018 at 3:30 p.m. On
9
December 4, 2017 Defendants filed a Notice of Motion setting a Motion to
10
Dismiss for January 29, 2018 at 8:30 a.m., which was subsequently continued
11
after the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Continue on January 5, 2018. The
12
Court issued an order on January 11, 2018 continuing the motion to February 20,
13
2017 at 8:30 a.m.
According to page 7:1-11 of the court’s order setting the scheduling
14
15
conference: "[...] the Court is aware that in some situations the case is not
16
procedurally in the posture for the Scheduling Conference to be held on the date
17
initially set. Such situations include, but are not limited to, those in which all
18
defendants have not yet been served or have not filed an answer to the complaint,
19
the defendant has defaulted, or where there is a pending motion to dismiss." The
20
Defendant’s motion to dismiss will still be pending as Defendant’s opposition is
21
now due on February 6, 2018, the day of the continued Scheduling Conference.
22
Thus, both parties by and through their respective counsel, have agreed, and
23
hereby request, that the Court continue the Scheduling Conference on February 6,
24
2018 to after the Motion to Dismiss is heard.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED
2
3
Dated: January 17, 2018
ADAMS FERRONE & FERRONE
4
By: /s/
Robert L. Baumann
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
BRYAN ROSSY, et al.
5
6
7
8
9
Dated: January 17, 2018
GROSSBERG & HOEHN
10
By: /s/
Scott J. Grossberg
Laurel A. Hoehn
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF BISHOP, et al.
11
12
13
14
ORDER
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
After review of all papers and pleadings filed in connection with the
motion, good cause appearing, the Court hereby accepts the Stipulation by the
Parties and the Scheduling Conference is hereby continued from February 6, 2018
to April 24, 2018 at 3:00 PM in Courtroom 9. A Joint Scheduling Conference
Report is due one week before the new conference date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 17, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?