Rossy et al v. City of Bishop et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Scheduling Conference from 2/6/2018 to 4/24/2018 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. A Joint Scheduling Conference Report is due one week before the new conference date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/17/2018. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Robert L. Baumann, SBN 261665 rbaumann@adamsferrone.com Adams, Ferrone and Ferrone APC 4333 Park Terrace Drive, Suite 200 Westlake Village, CA 91361 Telephone: 805-373-5900 Facsimile: 818-874-1382 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, BRYAN ROSSY, et al. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Scott J. Grossberg (Bar No. 123359) sgrossberg@grossberghoehn.com Laurel A. Hoehn (Bar No. 232946) lhoehn@grossberghoehn.com GROSSBERG & HOEHN 1026 W. Foothill Blvd. Upland, CA 91786 (909) 483-1850/Phone (909) 483-1840/Fax Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF BISHOP, et al. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRYAN ROSSY, MARK ) GUTIERREZ, JARED WAASDORP, ) and DOUGLAS MAIRS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF BISHOP, a public agency ) and/or municipal corporation; CHRIS ) CARTER, individually and as Police ) Chief; TED STEC, individually and as ) Police Chief; JIM TATUM, ) individually; PAT GARDNER, ) individually; and DOES 1 THROUGH ) 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 Case No. 1:17-cv-01244-LJO-SAB JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER Plaintiffs Bryan Rossy, et al. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants City 1 2 of Bishop, et al. (collectively “Defendants”) by and through their counsel of 3 record, hereby request a continuance of the Scheduling Conference. 4 On September 18, 2017, the Court issued an order setting a Scheduling 5 Conference on December 4, 2017 at 2:15 p.m., which was subsequently continued 6 after Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Continue the Scheduling Conference on 7 November 22, 2017. The Court granted the motion on November 27, 2017, 8 continuing the Scheduling Conference to February 6, 2018 at 3:30 p.m. On 9 December 4, 2017 Defendants filed a Notice of Motion setting a Motion to 10 Dismiss for January 29, 2018 at 8:30 a.m., which was subsequently continued 11 after the Parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Continue on January 5, 2018. The 12 Court issued an order on January 11, 2018 continuing the motion to February 20, 13 2017 at 8:30 a.m. According to page 7:1-11 of the court’s order setting the scheduling 14 15 conference: "[...] the Court is aware that in some situations the case is not 16 procedurally in the posture for the Scheduling Conference to be held on the date 17 initially set. Such situations include, but are not limited to, those in which all 18 defendants have not yet been served or have not filed an answer to the complaint, 19 the defendant has defaulted, or where there is a pending motion to dismiss." The 20 Defendant’s motion to dismiss will still be pending as Defendant’s opposition is 21 now due on February 6, 2018, the day of the continued Scheduling Conference. 22 Thus, both parties by and through their respective counsel, have agreed, and 23 hereby request, that the Court continue the Scheduling Conference on February 6, 24 2018 to after the Motion to Dismiss is heard. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED 2 3 Dated: January 17, 2018 ADAMS FERRONE & FERRONE 4 By: /s/ Robert L. Baumann Attorneys for Plaintiffs, BRYAN ROSSY, et al. 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: January 17, 2018 GROSSBERG & HOEHN 10 By: /s/ Scott J. Grossberg Laurel A. Hoehn Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF BISHOP, et al. 11 12 13 14 ORDER 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 After review of all papers and pleadings filed in connection with the motion, good cause appearing, the Court hereby accepts the Stipulation by the Parties and the Scheduling Conference is hereby continued from February 6, 2018 to April 24, 2018 at 3:00 PM in Courtroom 9. A Joint Scheduling Conference Report is due one week before the new conference date. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 17, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?