Rossy et al v. City of Bishop et al

Filing 78

ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to Close This Action and Reflect Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/6/19. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 BRYAN ROSSY, MARK GUTIERREZ, JARED WAASDORP, and DOUGLAS MAIRS, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THIS ACTION AND REFLECT DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 15 Case No. 1:17-cv-01244-SAB CITY OF BISHOP, CHRIS CARTER, TED STEC, JIM TATUM, and PAT GARDNER, (ECF No. 77) 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 On May 15, 2019, the parties in this action participated in a settlement conference before 20 United States Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe during which they reached a settlement and 21 Judge McAuliffe retained jurisdiction for one year to enforce the settlement agreement. On June 22 6, 2019, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice with each party to bear its own 23 costs and fees. 24 In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 25 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 26 dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. Pursuant to the May 15, 2019 minute order, the court shall retain jurisdiction for one 1 year to enforce the settlement agreement; and 1 2. 2 The Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: June 6, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?