Bryant v. Colorado Grill Fresno Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE A JOINT REPORT EXPLAINING WHY THE COURT SHOULD RETAIN JURISDICTION OVER SETTLEMENT. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint report on or before February 23, 2018, explaining why the Court should retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/16/2018. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RACHEL BRYANT, Plaintiff, 12 ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE A JOINT REPORT EXPLAINING WHY THE COURT SHOULD RETAIN JURISDICTION OVER SETTLEMENT v. 13 14 Case No. 1:17-cv-01266-SAB COLORADO GRILL FRESNO, INC., et al., (ECF No. 27) 15 Defendants. RESPONSE DUE: FEBRUARY 23, 2018 16 17 On September 21, 2017, Plaintiff Rachel Bryant filed this action alleging denial of right 18 of access under the Americans with Disabilities Act. During a scheduling conference on 19 February 6, 2018, the parties advised the Court that the matter had been conditionally settled. 20 On February 16, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation for dismissal of the action with 21 prejudice. (ECF No. 27.) The parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the 22 terms of their settlement agreement, but do not explain why. Since it is rare that the Court retain 23 jurisdiction, it is unclear why the Court would retain jurisdiction over the settlement contract and 24 any breach of that contract when the settlement was not reached at a settlement conference that 25 the Court conducted. Additionally, the parties should address how long the Court would be 26 expected to retain jurisdiction. 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint report on or 1 2 before February 23, 2018, explaining why the Court should retain jurisdiction to enforce the 3 terms of the settlement agreement. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: February 16, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?