Altimus v. Saint-Gobain Corp. of North America

Filing 34

ORDER GRANTING plaintiff's request for a continuance of the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 7/2/2018 and CONTINUING it to 8/21/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The Court grants t elephonic appearances, with each party directed to use the following dial-in number and passcode: 1-888-251-2909; passcode 1024453. The parties are also reminded to file a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the conference and email a copy of same, in Word format, to epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov, for the Judge's review. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/29/2018. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JUSTIN ALTIMUS, Case No. 1:17-cv-01271-DAD-EPG 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE 11 v. (ECF No. 33) 12 13 SAINT-GOBAIN CORP., et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 On June 28, 2018, Plaintiff filed a proposed scheduling report and request for continuance (ECF No. 33). Plaintiff requests a continuance of the scheduling conference currently set for July 2, 2018. Plaintiff notes that the district court’s order (ECF No. 28) on Defendants’ motion to dismiss was only recently issued, and Plaintiff needs additional time following the issuance of that order to meet and confer with Defendants. The Court finds good cause exists for granting the requested continuance. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for a continuance of the scheduling conference (ECF No. 33) is GRANTED. The scheduling conference set for July 2, 2018, at 11:15 AM, is vacated and reset to August 21, 2018, at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 10, before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: June 29, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?