U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pape Material Handling, Inc. et al

Filing 51

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE for the Parties to File the Proposed Consent Degree; and ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/6/19.( Filing Deadline: 4/7/2019) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Anna Y. Park, CA SBN 164242 Sue J. Noh, CA SBN 192134 Rumduol Vuong, CA SBN 264392 Lorena Garcia-Bautista, CA SBN 234091 Gina Carrillo, AZ SBN 030579 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 255 East Temple Street, Fourth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-1083 Facsimile: (213) 894-1301 E-Mail: lado.legal@eeoc.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 21 vs. PAPE MATERIAL HANDLING, INC., and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01291-AWI-BAM JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE THE PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE; AND ORDER 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE HONORABLE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, DEFENDANT, AND ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Plaintiff UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Pape Material Handling, Inc. (hereinafter “Defendant”), through their respective counsel of record, hereby submits this Joint Stipulation for the Court to extend the deadline for the Parties to file the Proposed Consent Decree from -1- 1 2 March 7, 2019 to April 8, 2019. As previously stated, the Plaintiff and Defendant (hereinafter collectively “Parties”) 3 were able to reach a settlement on September 20, 2018, and have agreed in principle to the 4 monetary amount and major terms of the injunctive remedies. (ECF No. 38) Per the Parties’ 5 request, the Court ordered the Parties to file the Proposed Consent Decree no later than March 6 7, 2019. (ECF No. 49). 7 During this time, the Parties have diligently worked towards finalizing the many details 8 of the Proposed Consent Decree, which have included exchanging drafts of the Proposed 9 Consent Decree and its exhibit. While the Parties have made significant progress, the Parties 10 need an additional 30 days to finalize the Proposed Consent Decree. As such, good cause 11 exists to extend the deadline to file the Proposed Consent Decree, as such action would 12 minimize costs and conserve judicial resources to concentrate on finalizing the Proposed 13 Consent Decree. Furthermore, the requested continuance will not result in any undue delay or 14 prejudice to either party. 15 Accordingly, the Parties request that this Court continue the stay of the case and extend 16 the March 7, 2019 deadline for the Parties to file the Proposed Consent Decree to 30 days or 17 April 8, 2019. Respectfully submitted, 18 19 Dated: March 4, 2019 /s/ Lorena Garcia-Bautista Lorena Garcia-Bautista Attorney for Plaintiff U.S. EEOC U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Dated: March 4, 2019 /s/ Ryan L. Eddings Ryan L. Eddings Attorney for Defendant Pape Material Handling, Inc. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, Lorena Garcia-Bautista, certify that the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document as I obtained authorization for the electronic signatures of all parties on the document. -2- ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the deadline for the parties 3 to file the Proposed Consent Decree is HEREBY EXTENDED to April 7, 2019. However, the 4 stay in this matter was lifted on January 30, 2019, and therefore will not be extended. See Doc. 5 No. 49. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara March 6, 2019 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?