U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pape Material Handling, Inc. et al
Filing
51
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE for the Parties to File the Proposed Consent Degree; and ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/6/19.( Filing Deadline: 4/7/2019) (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Anna Y. Park, CA SBN 164242
Sue J. Noh, CA SBN 192134
Rumduol Vuong, CA SBN 264392
Lorena Garcia-Bautista, CA SBN 234091
Gina Carrillo, AZ SBN 030579
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
255 East Temple Street, Fourth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-1083
Facsimile: (213) 894-1301
E-Mail: lado.legal@eeoc.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
21
vs.
PAPE MATERIAL HANDLING, INC., and
DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:17-cv-01291-AWI-BAM
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE
THE PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE;
AND ORDER
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TO THE HONORABLE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE,
DEFENDANT, AND ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Plaintiff UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Pape Material Handling, Inc. (hereinafter
“Defendant”), through their respective counsel of record, hereby submits this Joint Stipulation
for the Court to extend the deadline for the Parties to file the Proposed Consent Decree from
-1-
1
2
March 7, 2019 to April 8, 2019.
As previously stated, the Plaintiff and Defendant (hereinafter collectively “Parties”)
3
were able to reach a settlement on September 20, 2018, and have agreed in principle to the
4
monetary amount and major terms of the injunctive remedies. (ECF No. 38) Per the Parties’
5
request, the Court ordered the Parties to file the Proposed Consent Decree no later than March
6
7, 2019. (ECF No. 49).
7
During this time, the Parties have diligently worked towards finalizing the many details
8
of the Proposed Consent Decree, which have included exchanging drafts of the Proposed
9
Consent Decree and its exhibit. While the Parties have made significant progress, the Parties
10
need an additional 30 days to finalize the Proposed Consent Decree. As such, good cause
11
exists to extend the deadline to file the Proposed Consent Decree, as such action would
12
minimize costs and conserve judicial resources to concentrate on finalizing the Proposed
13
Consent Decree. Furthermore, the requested continuance will not result in any undue delay or
14
prejudice to either party.
15
Accordingly, the Parties request that this Court continue the stay of the case and extend
16
the March 7, 2019 deadline for the Parties to file the Proposed Consent Decree to 30 days or
17
April 8, 2019.
Respectfully submitted,
18
19
Dated: March 4, 2019
/s/ Lorena Garcia-Bautista
Lorena Garcia-Bautista
Attorney for Plaintiff U.S. EEOC
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Dated: March 4, 2019
/s/ Ryan L. Eddings
Ryan L. Eddings
Attorney for Defendant
Pape Material Handling, Inc.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I, Lorena Garcia-Bautista, certify that the content of this document is acceptable to all
persons required to sign the document as I obtained authorization for the electronic signatures of
all parties on the document.
-2-
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the deadline for the parties
3
to file the Proposed Consent Decree is HEREBY EXTENDED to April 7, 2019. However, the
4
stay in this matter was lifted on January 30, 2019, and therefore will not be extended. See Doc.
5
No. 49.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
March 6, 2019
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?