U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Prestige Care, Inc. et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Scheduling Conference from 2/6/2018 to 5/31/2018 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a response to the complaint on or before January 23, 2018. Any motion filed in response to the EEOCs complaint shall be set in accord with Local Rule 230. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/4/2017. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Case No. 1:17-cv-01299-AWI-SAB
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
THE MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
(ECF No. 18)
14
PRESTIGE CARE,INC. et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
On December 1, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to extend time for the defendants to
respond to the complaint. The stipulation continues the mandatory scheduling conference to
September 2018. However, the Court declines to continue the scheduling conference for the
proposed amount of time. The Court shall continue the scheduling conference to May of 2018.
If the parties determine that a further continuance is necessary, they may file a stipulation prior
to the May scheduling conference.
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that
1.
Defendants’ shall file a response to the complaint on or before January 23, 2018.
2.
Any motion filed in response to the EEOC’s complaint shall be set in accord with
Local Rule 230; and
28
1
3.
1
The Mandatory Scheduling Conference is continued to May 31, 2018, at 10:30
a.m.
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 Dated:
December 4, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?