U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Prestige Care, Inc. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Scheduling Conference from 2/6/2018 to 5/31/2018 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a response to the complaint on or before January 23, 2018. Any motion filed in response to the EEOCs complaint shall be set in accord with Local Rule 230. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/4/2017. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Case No. 1:17-cv-01299-AWI-SAB STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. (ECF No. 18) 14 PRESTIGE CARE,INC. et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 On December 1, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to extend time for the defendants to respond to the complaint. The stipulation continues the mandatory scheduling conference to September 2018. However, the Court declines to continue the scheduling conference for the proposed amount of time. The Court shall continue the scheduling conference to May of 2018. If the parties determine that a further continuance is necessary, they may file a stipulation prior to the May scheduling conference. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1. Defendants’ shall file a response to the complaint on or before January 23, 2018. 2. Any motion filed in response to the EEOC’s complaint shall be set in accord with Local Rule 230; and 28 1 3. 1 The Mandatory Scheduling Conference is continued to May 31, 2018, at 10:30 a.m. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: December 4, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?