Williams v. Alfaro

Filing 23

ORDER DENYING 22 Motion for Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/11/2018. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv-01310-AWI-MJS (PC) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COURT ORDER v. (ECF NO. 22) S. ALFARO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against Defendants S. Alfaro, S. Alvarado, J. Burns, Campbell, R. Dollarhide, S. Longoria, Morelock, T. Noland, Sexton, C. Villarrial, who have yet to appear in the action. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a Court order permitting him limited communication with an inmate witness. (ECF No. 22.) The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has procedures to facilitate communication between inmates. Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3139; Department Operations Manual § 54010.22.1. Plaintiff does not state whether he has availed himself of this procedure. Furthermore, the Court finds no urgency in Plaintiff’s request. The 1 matter is in its infancy and no defendants have appeared. Plaintiff does not state 2 whether or how resort to proper procedures would impede his litigation of this case. 3 Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion is HEREBY DENIED without prejudice. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 11, 2018 /s/ 7 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?