Jones v. Oliveira, et al.

Filing 16

ORDER adopting 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full and denying 3 Plaintiff's Motion for TRO and Injunctive Relief for lack of jurisdiction signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/7/2018. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

CHARLES B. JONES,

10
11
12

Case No. 1:17-cv-01311-LJO-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Defendants.

(Docs. 3, 12)

v.
OLIVEIRA, et al.,

13
14
15
16

Plaintiff, Charles B. Jones, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

17

this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

18

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On May 1, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations which were

20

served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within twenty-one days.

21

Despite lapse of more than the allowed time Plaintiff has not filed any objections. Local Rule

22

304(b), (d).

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a

24

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the

25

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

26
27
28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on May 1, 2018 (Doc. 12), is adopted
in full; and
1

1

2.

2

Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order and injunctive relief, filed on
May 1, 2018 (Doc. 3), is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

June 7, 2018

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2