Garcia v. Garcia, et al.
Filing
71
ORDER for the Warden of Pelican Bay State Prison to Appear on November 16,2021 to Show Cause for Failure to Obey a Court Order; ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Serve a Copy of this Order on Senior Assistant Attorney General Monica Anderson, the War den of Pelican Bay State Prison, and the Litigation Coordinator at Pelican Bay State Prison, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/03/2021. Show Cause Zoom Hearing set for 11/16/2021 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Maldonado, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARCO A. GARCIA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
GARCIA, et al.,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Defendants.
Case No. 1:17-cv-01313-BAM (PC)
ORDER FOR THE WARDEN OF PELICAN
BAY STATE PRISON TO APPEAR ON
NOVEMBER 16, 2021 TO SHOW CAUSE
FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER
(ECF No. 59)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
SERVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER ON
SENIOR ASSISTANT ATTORNEY
GENERAL MONICA ANDERSON, THE
WARDEN OF PELICAN BAY STATE
PRISON, AND THE LITIGATION
COORDINATOR AT PELICAN BAY STATE
PRISON
Show Cause Hearing: November 16, 2021 at
1:30 p.m. (Zoom)
Plaintiff Marco A. Garcia (“Plaintiff”) is a former pretrial detainee and current state
23
prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
24
§ 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Garcia and Bursiaga for excessive force in
25
violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge
26
jurisdiction. (ECF No. 28.) The jury trial in this matter was originally set for November 1, 2021,
27
and has been continued to November 30, 2021 for failure to produce Plaintiff and his legal
28
property for trial on November 1, 2021. (ECF No. 67.)
1
1
On September 28, 2021, the Court issued an order and writ of habeas corpus ad
2
testificandum directing the Warden of Pelican Bay State Prison to produce Plaintiff “to appear in
3
person in Courtroom #8, 6th Floor, United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno,
4
California on November 1, 2021, at 8:30 a.m. for a jury trial in this matter.” (ECF No. 59, p. 1.)
5
The writ further stated:
6
WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above, along with
any necessary legal property, to appear in person to testify before the United
States District Court, at the time and place above, and from day to day until
competition of court proceedings, or as ordered by the court; and thereafter to
return the inmate to the above institution.
7
8
9
10
(ECF No. 59, pp. 1–2 (emphasis in original).)
The Court attempted to commence the jury trial on the date and time ordered. Plaintiff
11
12
had been transported to California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“CSATF”), from Pelican
13
Bay State Prison, prior to trial and appeared before the undersigned in Courtroom 8. However,
14
despite the explicit language in the writ, Plaintiff was not in possession of any of his legal
15
property. Plaintiff stated, on the record, that he had alerted officers at Pelican Bay before he was
16
transported that he required his legal property to be transported with him to CSATF for trial in
17
this case. However, Plaintiff’s legal property was transpacked with the remainder of his property,
18
and his legal property did not accompany him in the transport from Pelican Bay. Plaintiff stated
19
that he would be unable to proceed with trial without the specific materials he had prepared for
20
trial and which were currently unavailable to him. The transporting officers accompanying
21
Plaintiff from CSATF stated that Plaintiff’s property at Pelican Bay could not be obtained in a
22
timely fashion.
Given this information, the Court found it necessary to continue the jury trial in this
23
24
matter. The failure to comply with the Court’s order has resulted in delay in the judicial
25
proceedings and unnecessary costs to the parties and the State of California. The waiting jurors
26
were excused from service because the Court was unable to commence trial.
27
///
28
///
2
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The Warden of Pelican Bay State Prison SHALL appear before the undersigned on
3
November 16, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. to show cause why sanctions, including monetary
4
sanctions or contempt, should not be imposed for the failure to comply with an order of
5
the Court regarding transportation of Plaintiff and his necessary legal property;
6
2. In light of evolving coronavirus protocols, the Warden shall appear remotely via Zoom;
7
3. The Warden, or any other party wishing to appear, shall contact Courtroom Deputy,
8
Esther Valdez, at (559) 499-5788 or evaldez@caed.uscourts.gov for the video and dial-in
9
information;
10
4. The Warden may submit a written response to this order to show cause on or before
11
November 9, 2021. Notwithstanding any written response, the Warden will be required
12
to personally appear before the Court via Zoom on November 16, 2021;
13
5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Senior Assistant
14
Attorney General Monica Anderson, the Warden of Pelican Bay State Prison, and the
15
Litigation Coordinator at Pelican Bay State Prison; and
16
17
18
19
20
6. Failure of the Warden of Pelican Bay State Prison to appear before the Court on
November 16, 2021, will result in the imposition of sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
November 3, 2021
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?