McCrea v. Lesniak et al

Filing 10

ORDER denying 9 Motion to address the Court on PLRA signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/14/2017. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 TERRENCE MCCREA, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 LESNIAK, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01329-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ADDRESS THE COURT ON PLRA [ECF No. 9] 19 20 21 Plaintiff Terrence McCrea is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 22 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion titled, “Motion to Address the Court on 23 (PLRA) Requesting the Court Accept the Claim on the Grounds of Imminent Danger Threats,” 24 filed on November 13, 2017. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff argues in the motion that he qualifies to be 25 permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in this action due to allegations of a risk of imminent 26 danger of physical harm. 27 28 Plaintiff’s motion is unnecessary. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter by the Court’s October 11, 2017 order. (ECF No. 5.) 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on grounds 1 2 that he alleged imminent danger threats is HEREBY DENIED, as unnecessary. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: November 14, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?