McCrea v. Lesniak et al
Filing
10
ORDER denying 9 Motion to address the Court on PLRA signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/14/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
TERRENCE MCCREA,
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
LESNIAK, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:17-cv-01329-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO ADDRESS THE COURT ON PLRA
[ECF No. 9]
19
20
21
Plaintiff Terrence McCrea is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
22
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion titled, “Motion to Address the Court on
23
(PLRA) Requesting the Court Accept the Claim on the Grounds of Imminent Danger Threats,”
24
filed on November 13, 2017. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff argues in the motion that he qualifies to be
25
permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in this action due to allegations of a risk of imminent
26
danger of physical harm.
27
28
Plaintiff’s motion is unnecessary. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma
pauperis in this matter by the Court’s October 11, 2017 order. (ECF No. 5.)
1
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on grounds
1
2
that he alleged imminent danger threats is HEREBY DENIED, as unnecessary.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
November 14, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?