Deloney v. County of Fresno et al

Filing 63

ORDER modifying Scheduling Order 24 , 62 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/8/2019. Discovery due by 6/20/2019. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 7/26/2019. Dispositive Motions filed by 11/22/2019. Status Conference set for 6/18/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Pretrial Conference set for 5/28/2020 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 8/4/2020 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CASE NO. 1:17-cv-01336-LJO-EPG WILMA DELONEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. (ECF Nos. 24, 62) 14 15 ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 The Court held a status conference on February 7, 2019. Plaintiff’s counsel, James 20 21 Cook, was present telephonically. Matthew Grigg, counsel for Defendants Yang, Santos, Trow, 22 and Whitecotton, was present telephonically. James D. Weakly, counsel for Defendants County 23 of Fresno, Vinton,1 McCoy, Ramos, Canal, Yusif, Delgarza, and De La Cruz was personally 24 present. 25 1 26 27 28 During the status conference, Mr. Weakley stated that he was not representing Defendant Vinton aka Vinson, and that Defendant Vinton has never been served. However, Mr. Weakley filed an answer on behalf of Defendant Vinton (ECF No. 8), and has accordingly entered his appearance as attorney of record for Defendant Vinton. See Local Rule 182(a)(2). Mr. Weakley has neither sought nor been granted leave to withdraw as counsel for Defendant Vinton. See Local Rule 182(d) (“an attorney who has appeared may not withdraw leaving the client in propria persona without leave of court upon noticed motion and notice to the client and all other parties who have appeared.”). Further, by filing an answer that does not challenge the adequacy of service, Defendant Vinton has waived service of process. See generally Benny v. Pipes, 799 F.2d 489, 492 (9th Cir. 1986) (“[A] general 1 1 2 As discussed during the status conference, and finding good cause, IT IS ORDERED that the scheduling conference order (ECF No. 24) is modified as follows: 3 1. Nonexpert discovery cutoff is June 20, 2019; 4 2. Expert disclosure deadline is July 26, 2019; 5 3. Rebuttal expert disclosure deadline is September 13, 2019; 6 4. Expert discovery cutoff is October 25, 2019; 7 5. Dispositive motion filing deadline is November 22, 2019; 8 6. A status conference is set for June 18, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. The parties shall file a joint status report by June 11, 2019. If the parties determine that this status 9 10 conference is not necessary, the parties shall notify the Court no later than close of 11 business on June 11, 2019. 12 7. (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; 13 14 8. Jury Trial (14-21 day estimate) is set for August 4, 2020, at 08:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. 15 16 The Pretrial Conference is set for May 28, 2020, at 08:15 a.m., in Courtroom 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to 17 correct the docket to indicate the correct spelling of the last name of Defendant Vinton, who is 18 currently designated on the docket as “Vinson.” 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 8, 2019 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 appearance or responsive pleading by a defendant that fails to dispute personal jurisdiction will waive any defect in service or personal jurisdiction.”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted), amended 807 F.2d 1514 (9th Cir.); DePrins v. Clark, 566 Fed. Appx. 608, 610 & n.2 (9th Cir. 2014) (“[A] party waives service of process when it files an answer to the complaint[.]”) (citing id.). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?