Halstead v. Rustigian, et al.
Filing
55
ORDER on STIPULATION to File First Amended Complaint and Withdraw Pending Motion for Leave to Amend 52 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/2/2018: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,
Wayte & Carruth LLP
2 Christina C. Tillman, #258627
christina.tillman@mccormickbarstow.com
3 7647 North Fresno Street
Fresno, California 93720
4 Telephone:
(559) 433-1300
Facsimile:
(559) 433-2300
5
Attorneys for Grace Rustigian
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
9
10
CHARLES HALSTEAD,
Case No. 1:17-CV-01337 SKO
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
WITHDRAW PENDING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND; ORDER THEREON
GRACE RUSTIGIAN,
14
Defendant.
15
(Doc. 52)
16
17
Plaintiff Charles Halstead in propria persona and Defendant Grace Rustigian by and through
18
her counsel of record hereby stipulate as follows:
19
1.
On July 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed a noticed Motion for Leave to File First Amended
20
Complaint.
21
2.
McCormick Barstow LLP substituted in as counsel for Defendant, which consent
22
order regarding the substitution was executed by the Court on July 18, 2018.
23
3.
24
The Parties met and conferred and agreed to modify the proposed First Amended
Complaint underlying Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint.
25
4.
Based on the agreement of the Parties, to conserve judicial resources on having to
26
rule on a opposition by Defendant, the Parties hereby stipulate that the Motion for Leave to File
27
First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff and set for hearing August 15, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., is
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
STIPULATION TO FILE FAC AND WITHDRAW PENDING MOTION; ORDER THEREON
1 hereby withdrawn. The Parties request that the Court vacate the hearing on the above-referenced
2 motion.
3
5.
The Parties further stipulate to Plaintiff filing a First Amended Complaint as attached
4 hereto as Exhibit “A”, to having the First Amended Complaint deemed filed upon the Court’s
5 execution of the Order below, and that Defendant Grace Rustigian and both newly named defendants
6 shall have 21 days to file a responsive pleading.
7
8 Dated: August 1, 2018
9
10
By: /s/ Charles Halstead (as authorized on 8/1/18)
Charles Halstead, in propria persona
11
12
13
14
Dated: August 1, 2018
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
15
16
By:
17
18
/s/ Christina C. Tillman
Christina C. Tillman
Attorneys for Grace Rustigian
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER
Based on the parties’ above Stipulation to File First Amended Complaint and Withdraw
24 Pending Motion for Leave to Amend (the “Stipulation”) (Doc. 52), Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to
25 File First Amended Complaint (the “Motion”) (Doc. 35) is HEREBY WITHDRAWN. The Motion
26 hearing date of August 15, 2018 is VACATED.
27
In further accordance with the Stipulation, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to file
28 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit “A” to the Stipulation (Doc. 52, Ex. A) on
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
2
STIPULATION TO FILE FAC AND WITHDRAW PENDING MOTION; ORDER THEREON
1 the docket captioned as Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, which is deemed filed as of the date
2 of this Order. In view of the filing of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff’s Amended
3 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Doc. 37), is DENIED as moot.
4
All Defendants named in the First Amended Complaint SHALL have twenty-one (21) days
5 from the date of this Order to file a responsive pleading.
6
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
August 2, 2018
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
3
STIPULATION TO FILE FAC AND WITHDRAW PENDING MOTION; ORDER THEREON
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?