Northern Central Distributing, Inc. v. Bogenschutz et al
Filing
75
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of the Non-Expert Discovery deadline to 7/19/2019. The Court further continues the Mid-Discovery Status Conference currently set for 3/13/2019, continuing it to 5/13/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/31/2019. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
Marcus N. DiBuduo #258684
Jared C. Marshall #272065
DOWLING AARON INCORPORATED
8080 North Palm Avenue, Third Floor
P.O. Box 28902
Fresno, California 93729-8902
Tel: (559) 432-4500
Fax: (559) 432-4590
mdibuduo@dowlingaaron.com
jmarshall@dowlingaaron.com
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff NORTHERN CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
NORTHERN CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING,
INC., a California Corporation, dba
YOSEMITE HOME DÉCOR;
14
Case No. 1:17-CV-01351-AWI-EPG
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
DISCOVERY CUTOFF
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
17
18
ROCKIE BOGENSCHUTZ, an individual;
ROCKIE’S CONTAINERS, LLC, a
California limited liability company, dba YDÉCOR and YOSEMITE DÉCOR, and
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive.
19
Defendant.
20
21
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
22
Plaintiff NORTHERN CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING, INC. ("Plaintiff") and defendants
23
ROCKIE
BOGENSCHUTZ;
and
ROCKIE’S
CONTAINERS,
LLC
("Defendants")
24
(collectively, "Parties") submit the following stipulation to extend non-expert discovery cutoff to
25
July 19, 2019, and jointly request modification of the Court’s Scheduling Order dated March 23,
26
2018, to reflect the same pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4).
27
///
28
///
1
1.
By stipulation and order dated January 8, 2018, this Court entered a
2
preliminary injunction against Defendants.
3
prohibited Defendants for undertaking certain acts likely to confuse, mislead, or deceive
4
consumers, including continuing to use certain stock keeping units, model numbers, photos, or
5
product identifiers that are similar or identical to those used by Plaintiff.
6
2.
The January 8, 2018, preliminary injunction
On August 21, 2018, after full briefing and further supplemental briefing,
7
this Court issued an order finding Defendants in contempt for violating the January 8, 2018,
8
preliminary injunction and sanctioning Defendants $33,500.00 plus Plaintiff’s reasonable
9
attorney’s fees and costs. On December 12, 2018, this Court ordered Defendants to pay to
10
Plaintiff $12,866.24 in fees and $225.18 in costs.
11
3.
On November 6, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for a second contempt order
12
and argued that Defendants were still refusing to fully comply with the Court’s January 8, 2018,
13
preliminary injunction and had not rectified all of the contumacious acts identified in the Court’s
14
August 21, 2018, contempt order. Defendants filed an opposition to the motion on November
15
26, 2018. Plaintiff filed its reply on December 3, 2018. The Parties are currently awaiting the
16
Court’s ruling.
17
4.
Throughout the duration of the lawsuit, the Parties have been attempting
18
to resolve their dispute while avoiding the cost intensive exercise of serving and responding to
19
discovery. Negotiations remain ongoing and progress is being made toward settlement.
20
5.
The Court’s March 23, 2018, Scheduling Order set non-expert discovery
21
cutoff for April 12, 2019 and expert discovery cutoff for July 19, 2019. In order to accommodate
22
the Parties’ settlement negotiations without sacrificing their ability to conduct discovery in the
23
unlikely event that an agreement cannot be reached, the Parties agree that there is good cause to
24
extend non-expert discovery cutoff to July 19, 2019. As the Parties do not anticipate substantial
25
expert testimony or discovery, there is no reason that expert and non-expert discovery cannot be
26
conducted simultaneously.
27
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, by and through
28
the undersigned, that in light of the pending ruling on the second motion for contempt and the
2
1
Parties’ continuing efforts to settle the case, good cause exists to modify the Court’s March 23,
2
2018, Scheduling Order to reflect a non-expert discovery cutoff date of July 19, 2019. All other
3
dates shall remain as set by the March 23, 2018, Scheduling Order.
4
Dated:
January 30, 2019
DOWLING AARON INCORPORATED
5
6
By:
7
8
/s/ Marcus N. DiBuduo
Marcus N. DiBuduo
Jared C. Marshall
Attorneys
for
Plaintiff
NORTHERN
CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING, INC.
9
10
Dated:
January 29, 2019
MOTSCHIEDLER, MICHAELIDES,
WISHON, BREWER & RYAN, LLP
11
12
By:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
/s/ Russell K. Ryan
Russell K. Ryan
Attorneys for Defendants
ROCKIE BOGENSCHUTZ, ROCKIE’S
CONTAINERS, LLC, dba Y-DÉCOR and
YOSEMITE DÉCOR
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing, the Court’s
3
4
March 23, 2018, Scheduling Order shall be modified to continue the non-expert discovery cutoff
5
date to July 19, 2019. The Court further continues the Mid-Discovery Status Conference
6
currently set for March 13, 2019, to May 13, 2019, at 10:00 am. The parties are reminded to file
7
8
a joint status report one full week prior to the conference and email a copy of same, in Word
format, to epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov, for the Judge's review. To appear telephonically, each
9
10
11
12
party is directed to use the following dial-in number and passcode: 1-888-251-2909; passcode
1024453.
/s/
DATED: January 31, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?