Northern Central Distributing, Inc. v. Bogenschutz et al

Filing 75

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of the Non-Expert Discovery deadline to 7/19/2019. The Court further continues the Mid-Discovery Status Conference currently set for 3/13/2019, continuing it to 5/13/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/31/2019. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Marcus N. DiBuduo #258684 Jared C. Marshall #272065 DOWLING AARON INCORPORATED 8080 North Palm Avenue, Third Floor P.O. Box 28902 Fresno, California 93729-8902 Tel: (559) 432-4500 Fax: (559) 432-4590 mdibuduo@dowlingaaron.com jmarshall@dowlingaaron.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff NORTHERN CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING, INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 NORTHERN CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING, INC., a California Corporation, dba YOSEMITE HOME DÉCOR; 14 Case No. 1:17-CV-01351-AWI-EPG STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY CUTOFF Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 17 18 ROCKIE BOGENSCHUTZ, an individual; ROCKIE’S CONTAINERS, LLC, a California limited liability company, dba YDÉCOR and YOSEMITE DÉCOR, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive. 19 Defendant. 20 21 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 Plaintiff NORTHERN CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING, INC. ("Plaintiff") and defendants 23 ROCKIE BOGENSCHUTZ; and ROCKIE’S CONTAINERS, LLC ("Defendants") 24 (collectively, "Parties") submit the following stipulation to extend non-expert discovery cutoff to 25 July 19, 2019, and jointly request modification of the Court’s Scheduling Order dated March 23, 26 2018, to reflect the same pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4). 27 /// 28 /// 1 1. By stipulation and order dated January 8, 2018, this Court entered a 2 preliminary injunction against Defendants. 3 prohibited Defendants for undertaking certain acts likely to confuse, mislead, or deceive 4 consumers, including continuing to use certain stock keeping units, model numbers, photos, or 5 product identifiers that are similar or identical to those used by Plaintiff. 6 2. The January 8, 2018, preliminary injunction On August 21, 2018, after full briefing and further supplemental briefing, 7 this Court issued an order finding Defendants in contempt for violating the January 8, 2018, 8 preliminary injunction and sanctioning Defendants $33,500.00 plus Plaintiff’s reasonable 9 attorney’s fees and costs. On December 12, 2018, this Court ordered Defendants to pay to 10 Plaintiff $12,866.24 in fees and $225.18 in costs. 11 3. On November 6, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for a second contempt order 12 and argued that Defendants were still refusing to fully comply with the Court’s January 8, 2018, 13 preliminary injunction and had not rectified all of the contumacious acts identified in the Court’s 14 August 21, 2018, contempt order. Defendants filed an opposition to the motion on November 15 26, 2018. Plaintiff filed its reply on December 3, 2018. The Parties are currently awaiting the 16 Court’s ruling. 17 4. Throughout the duration of the lawsuit, the Parties have been attempting 18 to resolve their dispute while avoiding the cost intensive exercise of serving and responding to 19 discovery. Negotiations remain ongoing and progress is being made toward settlement. 20 5. The Court’s March 23, 2018, Scheduling Order set non-expert discovery 21 cutoff for April 12, 2019 and expert discovery cutoff for July 19, 2019. In order to accommodate 22 the Parties’ settlement negotiations without sacrificing their ability to conduct discovery in the 23 unlikely event that an agreement cannot be reached, the Parties agree that there is good cause to 24 extend non-expert discovery cutoff to July 19, 2019. As the Parties do not anticipate substantial 25 expert testimony or discovery, there is no reason that expert and non-expert discovery cannot be 26 conducted simultaneously. 27 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, by and through 28 the undersigned, that in light of the pending ruling on the second motion for contempt and the 2 1 Parties’ continuing efforts to settle the case, good cause exists to modify the Court’s March 23, 2 2018, Scheduling Order to reflect a non-expert discovery cutoff date of July 19, 2019. All other 3 dates shall remain as set by the March 23, 2018, Scheduling Order. 4 Dated: January 30, 2019 DOWLING AARON INCORPORATED 5 6 By: 7 8 /s/ Marcus N. DiBuduo Marcus N. DiBuduo Jared C. Marshall Attorneys for Plaintiff NORTHERN CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING, INC. 9 10 Dated: January 29, 2019 MOTSCHIEDLER, MICHAELIDES, WISHON, BREWER & RYAN, LLP 11 12 By: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 /s/ Russell K. Ryan Russell K. Ryan Attorneys for Defendants ROCKIE BOGENSCHUTZ, ROCKIE’S CONTAINERS, LLC, dba Y-DÉCOR and YOSEMITE DÉCOR 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing, the Court’s 3 4 March 23, 2018, Scheduling Order shall be modified to continue the non-expert discovery cutoff 5 date to July 19, 2019. The Court further continues the Mid-Discovery Status Conference 6 currently set for March 13, 2019, to May 13, 2019, at 10:00 am. The parties are reminded to file 7 8 a joint status report one full week prior to the conference and email a copy of same, in Word format, to epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov, for the Judge's review. To appear telephonically, each 9 10 11 12 party is directed to use the following dial-in number and passcode: 1-888-251-2909; passcode 1024453. /s/ DATED: January 31, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?