McCurdy v. Kernan et al

Filing 141

ORDER VACATING 123 124 Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum as to Plaintiff and Inmate Christopher Price and RESCHEDULING Jury Trial to March 1, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom Nine signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/14/2022. Jury Trial Re-set for 3/1/2022 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JAMES C. McCURDY, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 v. S. KERNAN, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01356-SAB (PC) ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM AS TO PLAINTIFF AND INMATE CHRISTOPHER PRICE AND RESCHEDULING JURY TRIAL TO MARCH 1, 2022, AT 1:00 P.M. IN COURTROOM NINE (ECF Nos. 123, 124) Plaintiff James C. McCurdy is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 11 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. This case is currently set for jury trial on January 25, 2022, before the 12 undersigned. 13 On January 14, 2022, the Court held an informal status conference to discuss the recent surge 14 of COVID-19 cases. Plaintiff appeared pro se, and Marisa Kirschenbauer, Asha Jameson, and 15 Alexander Padua appeared on behalf of Defendant Bautista. 16 At the parties request, the jury trial is rescheduled from January 25, 2022 to March 1, 2022, at 17 1:00 p.m. before the undersigned in Courtroom Nine. All other deadlines set in this matter remain in 18 effect. The writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum as to Plaintiff and inmate Christopher Price issued 19 on December 17, 2021 (ECF Nos. 123, 124) are VACATED to be reissued for the new trial date in 20 due course. 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2022 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?