Zenaty Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER for an Extension of Time of 60 Days for Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/17/2018. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, and for cause shown, I T IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall have an extension of time to September 18, 2018, in which to file a response to Plaintiff's opening brief. All other deadlines set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. (Valdez, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8956 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 ROBERT ZENATY, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01362-BAM STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME OF 60 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S OPENING BRIEF 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 21 counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 60 additional days to 22 respond to Plaintiff’s opening brief. The current due date is July 20, 2018. The new due date 23 will be September 18, 2018. 24 This is Defendant’s first request for an extension of time in this case. There is good 25 cause for this request. Since the filing of Plaintiff’s opening brief, Defendant’s counsel has been 26 diligently addressing her full workload of district court cases and other cases that could not be 27 assigned to another attorney. Furthermore, Defendant’s counsel will be on approved leave for 28 approximately four weeks from July to August. 1 1 Thus, Defendant is respectfully requesting additional time up to and including September 2 18, 2018, to fully review the record and research the issues presented by Plaintiff’s opening brief 3 in this case. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the 4 proceedings. 5 6 7 Respectfully submitted, Date: July 16, 2018 8 9 s/ Shanny J. Lee by C.Chen* (As authorized by email on 7/16/2018) SHANNY J. LEE Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 11 12 LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C. Date: July 16, 2018 13 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney By s/ Carolyn B. Chen CAROLYN B. CHEN Special Assistant U. S. Attorney 14 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant 17 18 ORDER 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and for cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall have an extension of time to September 18, 2018, in which to file a response to Plaintiff’s opening brief. All other deadlines set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara July 17, 2018 26 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?