Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
Stipulation and Order for award and payment of attorneys fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)), signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/18/2018. (Rosales, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Melissa Newel (#148563)
NEWEL LAW
2625 Alcatraz Ave., Suite 132
Berkeley, CA 94704
(510) 316-3827
mnewel@newellawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
RUSSELL JOHNSON
12
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
TINA NAICKER
Social Security Administration
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 268-5611
Tina.Naicker@ssa.gov
13
Attorneys for Defendant
7
8
9
10
11
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
RUSSELL JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
20
21
22
23
24
Case No. 1:17-cv-1365-EPG
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
AWARD AND PAYMENT OF
ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (28
U.S.C. §2412(d))
Defendant.
25
26
27
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned
attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Russell Johnson (Plaintiff) be awarded
28
1
1
attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §2412 (d), in
2
the amount of two thousand five hundred one dollars and thirty-seven cents ($2,501.37). This
3
represents compensation for legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in
4
connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §2412 (d).
5
After the Court issues an Order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider
6
the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v.
7
Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the
8
attorney fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the
9
Treasury’s Offset Program. After the Order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will
10
determine whether they are subject to any offset.
11
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines
12
that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt subject to offset, then the government shall cause the
13
payment of fees approved to be made payable to Melissa Newel or Newel Law (collectively
14
“Plaintiff’s counsel”), pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any and all payments
15
made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel.
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA
16
17
attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under
18
EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any
19
and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees
20
and expenses in connection with this action.
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
2
1
2
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security
Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b), subject to the provisions of the EAJA.
3
Respectfully submitted,
4
5
Dated: September 17, 2018
6
NEWEL LAW
By:
7
8
Melissa Newel
Melissa Newel
Attorney for Plaintiff
RUSSELL JOHNSON
9
10
Dated: September 17, 2018
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
11
12
13
By:
Tina Naicker*
TINA NAICKER
(*Authorized by email dated 09/14/2018)
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1
2
3
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2412, fees in the amount of two
thousand five hundred one dollars and thirty-seven cents ($2,501.37) be awarded subject to the
4
terms of the Stipulation.
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 18, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?