Olivier v. Kernan

Filing 17

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for Failure to Pay Filing Fee,signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/14/18. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAURICE P. OLIVIER, 12 13 14 15 No. 1:17-cv-01367-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Maurice P. Olivier is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States District Court for 20 the Eastern District of California. 21 On December 21, 2017, the court adopted the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and 22 recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied 23 because he had previously suffered three or more prior strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. 24 No. 9.) Plaintiff was ordered to pay the $400 filing fee in full within twenty-one days and was 25 warned in the court’s prior order that his failure to pay the required filing fee would result in 26 dismissal of this action. (Id.) More than twenty-one days have passed following the issuance of 27 the December 21, 2017 order, and plaintiff has failed to pay the required $400 filing fee in 28 connection with this action. Accordingly, this case will be dismissed. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Given the foregoing: 1. This case is dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to pay the $400 filing fee; and 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 14, 2018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?