Snowden v. Yule et al

Filing 3

ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/17/2017. New Case Number 2:17-cv-2167 AC (PC).(Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No.: 1:17-cv-01387-BAM (PC) CURTIS SNOWDEN, III, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA v. M.YULE, et al., 16 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Curtis Snowden, III, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on October 16, 2017. 20 In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged 21 violations took place at Mule Creek State Prison, located in Amador County, which is part of the 22 Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. All 23 of the defendants are alleged to be employees of that prison. Therefore, the complaint should have 24 been filed in the Sacramento Division. Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 25 26 court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action 27 will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 3 4 5 California sitting in Sacramento; and 2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at: 6 United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: /s/ Barbara October 17, 2017 11 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?