Hisle v. Conanon, et al.
Filing
144
ORDER VACATING November 10, 2020 140 Findings and Recommendations, and Directing Defendant to File a Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment within Twenty-One Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/16/2020.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DENNIS CURTIS HISLE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
MARLYN CONANAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:17-cv-01400-NONE-SAB (PC)
ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 10, 2020
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND
DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN TWENTYONE DAYS
(ECF No. 140)
Plaintiff Dennis Curtis Hisle is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
On November 10, 2020, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that
20
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment filed on August 6, 2020, be denied. (ECF No. 140.)
21
Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations on December 3, 2020. (ECF No. 142.)
Based on a review of the record and Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds the November 10,
22
23
2020 Findings and Recommendations shall be vacated they were issued prior to the scheduling order
24
previously set forth in this case. (See ECF No. 124.)
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The November 10, 2020 Findings and Recommendations are vacated; and
3
2.
Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order, Defendant shall file
4
an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for summary
5
judgment filed on August 6, 2020 (ECF No. 122.)
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
9
December 16, 2020
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?