Hisle v. Conanon, et al.

Filing 9

ORDER DENYING, Without Prejudice, Plaintiff's 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/27/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DENNIS CURTIS HISLE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
MARLYN CONANON, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT
OF COUNSEL
[ECF No. 8]

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, filed on November

19
20

Case No.: 1:17-cv-01400-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff Dennis Curtis Hisle is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

22, 2017.

21

Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v.

22

Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court cannot require any attorney to represent

23

plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern

24

District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). However, in certain exceptional circumstances the court

25

may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to section 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at

26

1525.

27

///

28

///
1

Without a reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, the court will seek

1
2

volunteer counsel only in the most serious and exceptional cases. In determining whether

3

“exceptional circumstances exist, the district court must evaluate both the likelihood of success on the

4

merits [and] the ability of the [plaintiff] to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the

5

legal issues involved.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

6

In the present case, the Court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Even if it

7

assumed that plaintiff is not well versed in the law and that he has made serious allegations which, if

8

proved, would entitle him to relief, his case is not exceptional. Plaintiff alleges an Eighth Amendment

9

claim against prison officials for denying him appropriate medical attention. The legal issues present

10

in this action are not complex, and Plaintiff has thoroughly set forth his allegations in the amended

11

complaint. However, at this early stage in the proceedings, the Court cannot make a determination

12

that Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits, and based on a review of the record in this case, the

13

court does not find that plaintiff cannot adequately articulate his claims. Id.
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel is HEREBY

14
15

DENIED, without prejudice.

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

Dated:

19

November 27, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2