Douglas v. Plumley

Filing 5

ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/7/17. New Case Number 2:17-cv-02336-DB. Old Case Number 1:17-cv-01410-SKO. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

DAMIEN DOUGLAS,

7
8

Case No. 1:17-cv-01410-SKO HC

Petitioner,
v.

9

B.W. PLUMLEY, Warden,

10

ORDER TRANSFERRING THIS CASE TO
THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Respondent.

11
12
13

On October 19, 2017, Petitioner filed this pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

14

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner is in custody at the Federal Bureau of Prisons in Stockton,

15

California, in San Joaquin County. San Joaquin County, California, is properly venued in the

16

Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California.

17
18

A habeas action is subject to jurisdictional and statutory limitations. See Braden v. 30th
Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky, 410 U.S. 484 (1973). The proper respondent in a habeas corpus

19
20
21

action is the warden of the institution in which the petitioner is confined. Rumsfield v. Padilla, 542
U.S. 426, 434 (2004). Because the habeas petition must be reviewed by the district court in the

22

district where the petitioner is confined (United States v. Giddings, 740 F.2d 770, 772 (9th Cir.

23

1984)), this Court will transfer the petition to the Sacramento Division.

24
25

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that this case be TRANSFERRED to the
Sacramento Division of United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
1

1
Dated:
2

November 7, 2017

/s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Sheila K. Oberto

2

.