Heckathorn v. Holland
Filing
56
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/4/2018. Consent/Decline due within 10 days. Pleading Amendment Deadline 10/1/2018. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 7/1/2018; Non-Expert 5/10/2019; Expert 6/5/2019. Mid- Discovery Status Conference set for 11/16/2018 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 6/19/2019; Hearing by 7/17/2019. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: File d by 8/5/2019; Hearing by 9/16/2019. Pretrial Conference set for 11/8/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Jury Trial set for 1/7/2020 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JOSHUA HECKATHORN,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
KIM HOLLAND, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:17-cv-01416-AWI - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 10/1/2018
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 7/1/2018
Non-Expert: 5/10/2019
Expert: 6/5/2019
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
11/16/2018 at 8:30 a.m.
16
17
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 6/19/2019
Hearing: 7/17/2019
18
19
20
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 8/5/2019
Hearing: 9/16/2019
21
22
Pre-Trial Conference:
11/8/2019 at 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom 2
23
24
Trial: 1/7/2020 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 2
Jury trial: 10 days
25
26
27
28
I.
Date of Scheduling Conference
June 4, 2018.
1
1
II.
Appearances of Counsel
2
Kresta Daly appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.
3
Peter Hirsig appeared on behalf of Defendant S. Zarris.
4
Janine Jeffrey appeared on behalf of Defendant R. Ruvalcaba.
5
Harry Stern appeared on behalf of Defendants Ruiz, Perez, Morse and Foster.
6
7
III.
Information Concerning the Court’s Schedule
Out of fairness, the Court believes it is necessary to forewarn litigants that the Fresno Division
8
of the Eastern District of California now has the heaviest District Court Judge caseload in the entire
9
nation. While the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this case and all other civil cases in a timely
10
manner, the parties are admonished that not all of the parties’ needs and expectations may be met as
11
expeditiously as desired. As multiple trials are now being set to begin upon the same date, parties may
12
find their case trailing with little notice before the trial begins. The law requires that the Court give any
13
criminal trial priority over civil trials or any other matter. The Court must proceed with a criminal trial
14
even if a civil trial was filed earlier and set for trial first. Continuances of any civil trial under these
15
circumstances will no longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated finding of good cause. All
16
parties should be informed that any civil trial set to begin during the time a criminal trial is proceeding
17
will trail the completion of the criminal trial.
18
The parties are reminded of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all
19
proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to conduct trials, including
20
entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and Local
21
Rule 305. The same jury pool is used by both United States Magistrate Judges and United States
22
District Court Judges. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States Magistrate Judge is
23
taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. The parties are informed that
24
no substantive rulings or decisions will be affected by whether a party chooses to consent.
25
Finally, the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing
26
United States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant
27
to the Local Rules, Appendix A, reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance
28
notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern
2
1
District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to
2
3
conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel
4
SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating
5
whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.
6
IV.
Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
7
8
motion to amend, no later than October 2, 2018.
9
V.
10
11
12
13
14
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
on or before July 1, 2018.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before May
10, 2019, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before June 5, 2019.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before April 1, 2019,
15
and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before May 8, 2019. The written designation of retained and
16
non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and
17
shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with
18
this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such
19
experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
20
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
21
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
22
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
23
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
24
25
26
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for November 16, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. before the
27
28
1
In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the
examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the
expert’s opinions in this regard.
3
1
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
2
California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the
3
conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
4
The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be
5
completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this
6
order. Counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing (888) 557-8511 and entering Access Code
7
1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the
8
intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.
9
VI.
10
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
11
than June 19, 2019, and heard on or before July 17, 2019. Non-dispositive motions are heard at 9:00
12
a.m., before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United States
13
District Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California.
14
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned
15
Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good
16
faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the
17
moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate
18
Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the
19
court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,
20
Susan Hall at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with
21
Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice
22
and dropped from calendar.
23
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening
24
time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the
25
notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
26
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via teleconference by dialing (888) 557-
27
8511 and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk
28
receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the
4
1
noticed hearing date.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than August 5, 2019, and heard no later
2
3
than September 16, 2019, in Courtroom 2 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United
4
States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56
5
and Local Rules 230 and 260.
6
VII.
7
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary
8
adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues to
9
be raised in the motion.
10
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a
11
question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole or
12
in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the issues
13
for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the expense of
14
briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
15
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed
16
statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of
17
undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be
18
deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint
19
statement of undisputed facts.
20
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred
21
as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to
22
comply may result in the motion being stricken.
23
VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date
24
November 8, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before Judge Ishii.
25
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
26
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
27
directly to Judge Ishii's chambers, by email at AWIOrders@caed.uscourts.gov.
28
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
5
1
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
2
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
3
Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the
4
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
5
IX.
January 7, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United
6
7
Trial Date
States District Court Judge.
8
A.
This is a jury trial.
9
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 10 days.
10
C.
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
11
California, Rule 285.
12
X.
Settlement Conference
If the parties believe the action is in a settlement posture and a conference with the Court
13
14
would be fruitful, the parties may file a joint written request for a settlement conference.
15
Alternatively, the parties may file a joint written request for referral to the Court’s Voluntary Dispute
16
Resolution Program.
Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement conference will be
17
18
conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be
19
conducted by a judicial officer who is not assigned to this case, the joint request for a conference
20
should note this and the conference will be set before a different Magistrate Judge.
21
XI.
Requests for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other
22
Techniques to Shorten Trial
23
Not applicable at this time.
24
25
26
27
28
XII.
Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.
XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
6
1
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently
2
handle its increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal
3
Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.
4
XIV. Effect of this Order
5
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
6
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
7
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
8
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
9
subsequent status conference.
10
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
11
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations
12
extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by
13
affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
14
for granting the relief requested.
15
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
16
17
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 4, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?