Heckathorn v. Holland
Filing
69
ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk to Close the Action (Voluntary Dismissal),signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/21/18. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSUHA HECKATHORN,
12
13
14
Plaintiffs,
v.
KIM HOLLAND, et al.,
15
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:17-cv-1416-AWI- JLT
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE
THE ACTION
(Doc. 68)
16
17
Joshua Heckathorn, S. Zarris, R. Ruiz, J. Foster, B. Morse, P. Perez, and R. Ruvalcaba filed a
18
stipulation to dismiss the action, noting “Plaintiff hereby voluntarily dismisses this lawsuit pursuant to
19
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).” (Doc. 68 at 1) Pursuant to Rule 41, “the plaintiff
20
may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties
21
who have appeared.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
22
Because all remaining parties signed the stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.”
23
Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Thus, based
24
upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 21, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?