Heckathorn v. Holland

Filing 8

ORDER APPROVING 7 the Stipulation for an Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/27/2017. Responsive pleading due by 12/8/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA HECKATHORN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 KIM HOLLAND, 15 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01416-AWI- JLT ORDER APPROVING THE STIPULATION FOR AN EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (Doc. 7) 16 17 On November 22, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation for an extension of time for Defendant to 18 file and serve its response to Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Doc. 7) Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the 19 parties may stipulation to an extension of time “no more than twenty-eight (28) to respond to a 20 complaint … without approval of the Court if the extension is signed on behalf of all parties who have 21 appeared in the action and are affected by the stipulation.” 22 23 Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the stipulation, the motion for an extension of time is GRANTED and Defendant SHALL file a response to the complaint no later than December 8, 2017. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 27, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?