Willard v. Waddle

Filing 35

ORDER for Defendant Waddle to File a Response to Plaintiff's Motions within 30 Days 33 , 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/27/2020. ( Responses due by within THIRTY (30) DAYS.) (Orozco, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JOSHUA A. WILLARD, Plaintiff, 7 8 9 v. C. WADDLE, et al., 10 1:17-cv-01425-DAD-GSA-PC ORDER FOR DEFENDANT WADDLE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS WITHIN 30 DAYS (ECF Nos. 33, 34.) Defendant. 11 12 13 Joshua A. Willard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 14 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant C. Waddle for 15 retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. On November 8, 2019, a settlement conference 16 was held before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe and the case settled. (ECF No. 30.) On 17 December 9, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal, with prejudice, under 18 Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 31.) 19 On December 19, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to reopen the case, and on December 23, 20 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for copies. (ECF Nos. 33, 34). Defendant C. Waddle shall be 21 required to respond to Plaintiff’s motions within thirty days. 22 23 Accordingly, within thirty days of the date of service of this order, defendant C. Waddle shall file a response to Plaintiff’s motion to reopen the case and motion for copies. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 27, 2020 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?