Willard v. Waddle
Filing
35
ORDER for Defendant Waddle to File a Response to Plaintiff's Motions within 30 Days 33 , 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/27/2020. ( Responses due by within THIRTY (30) DAYS.) (Orozco, A)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
JOSHUA A. WILLARD,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
v.
C. WADDLE, et al.,
10
1:17-cv-01425-DAD-GSA-PC
ORDER FOR DEFENDANT WADDLE TO
FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS WITHIN 30 DAYS
(ECF Nos. 33, 34.)
Defendant.
11
12
13
Joshua A. Willard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
14
with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant C. Waddle for
15
retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. On November 8, 2019, a settlement conference
16
was held before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe and the case settled. (ECF No. 30.) On
17
December 9, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal, with prejudice, under
18
Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 31.)
19
On December 19, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to reopen the case, and on December 23,
20
2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for copies. (ECF Nos. 33, 34). Defendant C. Waddle shall be
21
required to respond to Plaintiff’s motions within thirty days.
22
23
Accordingly, within thirty days of the date of service of this order, defendant C. Waddle
shall file a response to Plaintiff’s motion to reopen the case and motion for copies.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 27, 2020
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?