Brulee et al v. GEICO Insurance Agency Inc. et al
Filing
16
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/23/2018. Pleading Amendment Deadline 4/23/2018. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 2/16/2018; Non-Expert 6/20/2018; Expert 8/3/2018. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set fo r 3/26/2018 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 8/10/2018; Hearing by 9/7/2018. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 9/7/2018; Hearing by 10/5/2018 . Settlement Conference set for 11/13/2018 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO), Fresno, before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Pretrial Conference set for 11/9/2018 at 10:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Jury Trial set for 12/10/2018 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SOPHIA BRULEE,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
MIDVALE INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
Case No.: 1:17-CV-01434- JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 4/23/2018
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 2/16/2018
Non-Expert: 6/20/2018
Expert: 8/3/2018
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
3/26/18 at 9:30 a.m.
18
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 8/10/2018
Hearing: 9/7/2018
19
20
21
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 9/7/2018
Hearing: 10/5/2018
22
23
Settlement Conference:
11/13/2018, 11:00 a.m., Courtroom 7
24
25
Pre-Trial Conference:
11/9/2018 at 10:00 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
26
27
Trial: 12/10/2018 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
Jury trial: 3-5 days
28
1
1
2
I.
January 23, 2018.
3
4
Date of Scheduling Conference
II.
Appearances of Counsel
5
Michael Marderosian appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs.
6
Heather McKeon appeared on behalf of Defendants.
7
III.
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Pleading Amendment Deadline
motion to amend, no later than April 23, 2018.
IV.
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
on or before February 16, 2018.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before June 20,
2018, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before August 3, 2018.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or June 29, 2018, and to
16
disclose all rebuttal experts on or before July 13, 2018. The written designation of retained and non-
17
retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall
18
include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with this
19
order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such experts
20
that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
21
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
22
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
23
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
24
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
25
26
27
28
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for March 26, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. before the
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
2
1
California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the
2
conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
3
The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be
4
completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this
5
order. Counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing (888) 557-8511 and entering Access Code
6
1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the
7
intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.
8
VI.
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
9
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
10
than August 10, 2018, and heard on or before September 7, 2018. The Court hears non-dispositive
11
motions at 9:00 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California.
No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it
12
13
is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written
14
discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party
15
with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by
16
agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly
17
shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the
18
obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule
19
this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at
20
(661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251
21
with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped
22
from the Court’s calendar.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than September 7, 2018, and heard no
23
24
later than October 5, 2018, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge,
25
at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. In scheduling such motions,
26
counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.
27
VII.
28
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary
3
1
adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues
2
to be raised in the motion.
3
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a
4
question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole
5
or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the
6
issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the
7
expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed
8
9
statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of
10
undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be
11
deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint
12
statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred
13
14
as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to
15
comply may result in the motion being stricken.
16
VIII. Pre-Trial Conference
17
November 9, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., located at the United States District Courthouse in
18
Bakersfield, California, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
19
20
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
21
directly to Judge Thurston's chambers, by email at JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
22
23
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
24
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
25
Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the
26
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
27
IX.
28
Trial Date
December 10, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield,
4
1
California, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.
2
A.
This is a jury trial.
3
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 3-5 days.
4
C.
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
5
California, Rule 285.
6
X.
7
Settlement Conference
A settlement conference is scheduled before the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, at 11:00 a.m.,
8
November 13, 2018, in courtroom 7, at the Robert E. Coyle Federal Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street,
9
Fresno, California. Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try
10
the case shall appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having
11
full authority to negotiate and settle the case on terms1 discussed at the conference. Consideration of
12
settlement is a serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth
13
below are the procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.
14
At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via
15
fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful2 settlement demand which includes a
16
brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the
17
settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond via fax or e-mail with an acceptance of the offer or
18
with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is
19
appropriate.
20
If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their
21
Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall
22
not be filed on the court docket.
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are
subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.
2
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing the settlement
conference via stipulation.
5
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
1
At least five court days before the settlement conference, the parties shall submit, directly to
2
3
Judge Oberto’s chambers by e-mail to SKOOrders@caed.uscourts.gov, a Confidential Settlement
4
Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on
5
any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference
6
Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the
7
Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.
8
The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:
9
A.
A brief statement of the facts of the case.
10
B.
A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which
11
the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on
12
the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.
13
C.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
14
D.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.
15
E.
The relief sought.
16
F.
The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.
17
18
XI.
19
Trial
Not applicable at this time.
20
21
22
23
24
Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques to Shorten
XII.
Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.
XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
25
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
26
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its
27
increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil
28
Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.
6
1
2
XIV. Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
3
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
4
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
5
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
6
subsequent status conference.
7
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
8
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations
9
extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by
10
affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
11
for granting the relief requested.
12
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 23, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?