Ross v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Request for an Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/11/2018. Opening Brief due by 7/23/2018. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHELLE RENEE ROSS, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01439 - JLT ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 17) On June 8, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation for Plaintiff to have a 45-day extension of time to 19 file an opening brief. (Doc. 17) The Scheduling Order allows for a single extension of thirty days by 20 the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 5 at 4). 21 Beyond the single extension of thirty days, “requests to modify [the scheduling] order must be 22 made by written motion and will be granted only for good cause.” (Doc. 5 at 4) Accordingly, the 23 Court construes the stipulation of the parties to be a motion to amend the Scheduling Order. The 24 parties report “there is good cause for the request for forty-five (45) days instead of thirty (30),” 25 because “the parties are in discussion regarding settlement of this case.” (Doc. 17 at 1-2) The parties 26 assert “delaying substantive briefing in this matter is appropriate in the event that a resolution can be 27 reached.” (Id. at 2) Accordingly, the parties request the deadline be extended from June 8, 2018, to 28 July 23, 2018. (Id.) 1 1 Based upon the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS: 2 1. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and 3 2. Plaintiff SHALL file an opening brief no later than July 23, 2018. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 11, 2018 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?