Santos Valenzuela v. Smith et al

Filing 40

ORDER Adopting 35 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, and DENYING Plaintiff's 34 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/15/2019. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SANTOS VALENZUELA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
SMITH, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:17-cv-01440-LJO-SAB (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
[ECF Nos. 34, 35]

18

Plaintiff Santos Valenzuela is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

19

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

20

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On December 10, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation which was

22

served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that objections to the Findings and

23

Recommendation were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed and the time to do

24

so has expired.

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

26

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

27

Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendation, filed on December 10, 2018, is adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, filed on December 7, 2018, is denied.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

January 15, 2019

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2