Huapaya v. Davey et al
Filing
22
ORDER GRANTING 20 Plaintiff's Motion to Accept Late Filing of Second Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/18/2018. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ENRIQUE HUAPAYA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
D. DAVEY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
ACCEPT LATE FILING OF SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
[ECF No. 20]
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On May 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the Court accept the late filing of his
19
20
Case No. 1:17-cv-01441-DAD-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff Enrique Huapaya is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
second amended complaint, along with a second amended complaint. (ECF Nos. 20, 21.)
On March 14, 2018, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and granted him
21
22
leave to file a second amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on the
23
claim found to be cognizable, within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). (ECF No.
24
17.) On April 10, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiff thirty days to comply with the Court’s March 14,
25
2018, order. (ECF No. 19.) Thus, Plaintiff’s second amended complaint was due on or before May
26
10, 2018.
27
///
28
///
1
In seeking relief from the late filing, Plaintiff indicates that he has not had access to the law
1
2
library because of an extensive lockdown. On the basis of good cause, the Court will excuse the late
3
filing of the second amended complaint and it is deemed timely filed. Plaintiff is advised that the
4
Court will screen the complaint in due course.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
8
May 18, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?