Huerta v. County of Tulare, et al
Filing
127
Order re stipulation and joint request of the parties for modification of the case management scheduling deadlines, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/14/2022. (Expert Disclosure due by 12/5/2022; Rebuttal-Supplemental Expert Disclo sures Due by 1/13/2023; Expert Discovery due by 2/21/2023; Motion for Summary Judgment; Dispositive Motion filed by 3/10/2023. Further, the parties shall file a joint stipulation and proposed order pursuant to the Court's order (ECF No. 124 ) by October 21, 2022. (Rosales, O.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
RAMIRO HUERTA,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:17-cv-01446-EPG
ORDER RE: STIPULATION AND JOINT
REQUEST OF THE PARTIES FOR
MODIFICATION OF THE CASE
MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE DEADLINES
COUNTY OF TULARE, et al.,
(ECF No. 126).
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
Before the Court is a stipulation to modify the scheduling order. (ECF No. 126). On
19
October 4, 2022, at the parties’ request, the Court held an informal discovery conference. (ECF
20
No. 123). The Court issued a minute order directing the parties to meet and confer regarding the
21
discussed details of the proposed Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 Examination. (ECF No.
22
124). The parties were to file a stipulation and proposed order regarding the Rule 35 examination
23
by October 11, 2022. (Id.) Because Plaintiff’s counsel indicated by email that the parties required
24
additional time to do so, the Court directed the parties to file the joint stipulation and proposed
25
order by October 13, 2022. (ECF No. 125).
26
On October 13, 2022, the parties filed a joint stipulation to modify the scheduling
27
presently before the Court. (ECF No. 126). As grounds, the stipulation states that during the meet
28
1
1
and confer process that was conducted pursuant to the Court’s order following the October 4,
2
2022, informal discovery conference, “the Parties conclude that it will not be possible to set
3
Plaintiff’s Rule 35 Examination before the November 4, 2022 expert disclosure deadline due to
4
scheduling conflicts between now and then.” (Id. at 3). As such, “the Parties determined that a
5
short continuance is necessary to conduct the Rule 35 examination and ensure that expert
6
7
8
disclosures are timely made consistent with the Court’s instructions.” (Id. at 3). Accordingly, the
parties seek a thirty-day extension for all expert discovery related dates as well as the dispositive
motion filing deadline. (Id. at 4).
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 126), IT IS ORDERED that:
9
1. The Court hereby Orders that the Court’s scheduling order (ECF No. 14, as modified
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
by ECF Nos. 85, 108, 119) is further modified as follows:
Case Management Event:
Prior-Operative DateNEW Date-Deadline:
Deadline:
Expert Disclosures & Reports November 4, 2022
December 5, 2022
Due (Initial)
Telephonic Status Conference December 12, 2022 at 10:30
December 12, 2022 at 10:30
a.m.
a.m.
(No Change)
Rebuttal-Supplemental Expert December 13, 2022
January 13, 2023
Disclosures Due:
Expert Discovery Cut-Off
January 20, 2023
February 21, 2023
17
18
MSJ/Dispositive Motion
Filing Deadline (MCOF):
February 10, 2023
March 10, 2023
19
2. No pretrial conference or trial date has been set. All unmodified terms and conditions
20
of the Court’s scheduling order (ECF No. 14, as modified by ECF Nos. 85, 108, 119)
21
remain in full force and effect.
22
3. For the telephonic status conference set for December 12, 2022, the parties shall file a
23
joint status report at least one week before the status conference, advising the Court
24
about the progress of expert discovery and any other issues the parties deem pertinent.
To participate, each party is to use the following dial-in number and passcode: Dial-in
25
number 1-888-251-2909; Passcode 1024453.
26
27
28
\\\
\\\
2
1
4. Further, the parties shall file a joint stipulation and proposed order pursuant to the
Court’s order (ECF No. 124) by October 21, 2022.
2
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 14, 2022
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?