Huerta v. County of Tulare, et al

Filing 165

STIPULATION and ORDER of Dismissal without Prejudice of Defendant County of Tulare Pursuant to Fed.R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); ORDER for Clerk of Court to Reflect Change in Caption signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/05/2023. County of Tulare terminated.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RAMIRO HUERTA,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

Case No. 1:17-cv-01446-EPG
ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT
COUNTY OF TULARE PURSUANT TO FED.
R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

COUNTY OF TULARE, et al.,
(ECF No. 164).

14

Defendants.
ORDER FOR CLERK OF COURT TO
REFLECT CHANGE IN CAPTION

15
16
17

On September 28, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation for dismissal without prejudice

18
19

of Defendant County of Tulare as the parties have stipulated that “Plaintiff’s claims against the

20

County of Tulare properly proceed against the Tulare County Sheriff’s Department.” (ECF No.

21

164, p. 2). In light of the parties’ stipulation, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant County of

22

Tulare have been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and have been dismissed without

23

prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate County of Tulare as a

24

defendant in this action.

25

\\\

26

\\\

27

\\\

28

\\\
1

1

Further, the Clerk of the Court is ordered to reflect his change in the caption of the case.

2

This action will henceforth be captioned Ramiro Huerta v. Tulare County Sheriff’s Department,

3

et al., 1:17-cv-01446-EPG.

4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6

Dated:

October 5, 2023

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2