Huerta v. County of Tulare, et al

Filing 20

Stipulation GRANTING Plaintiff leave to file Second Amended Complaint; Order,signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/12/2018. (Second Amended Complaint due by 4/18/2018) (Rosales, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Matthew D. Owdom
OWDOM LAW FIRM
627 N. Encina
Visalia, CA 93291
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
DEANNE H. PETERSON, #147099
County Counsel for the County of Tulare
KATHLEEN A. TAYLOR, #131100
Chief Deputy County Counsel
AMY TERRIBLE MYERS, #269475
Deputy County Counsel
2900 West Burrel Avenue
Visalia, California 93291
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants County of Tulare and
Tulare County Sheriff=s Department

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA B FRESNO

14
15

RAMIRO HUERTA,

16

Case Number: 1:17-cv-01446-DAD-EPG
Plaintiff,

STIPULATION GRANTING
PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

vs.
COUNTY OF TULARE, a governmental entity;
TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF, a governmental
entity; MICHAEL COLDREN; LAURA
TORRES-SALCIDO; HECTOR HERNANDEZ;
SALVADOR CEJA; JAMES DILLON; RONALD
SMITH; Unknown TULARE COUNTY
SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES named herein as Does
7 - 50; and ROES 1-50, inclusive,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28

County

1
JOINT STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Ramiro Huerta ("Plaintiff"), and
Defendants COUNTY OF TULARE, a governmental entity; TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF, a
1
2
3

governmental entity, MICHAEL COLDREN; LAURA TORRES-SALCIDO; HECTOR
HERNANDEZ; SALVADOR CEJA; JAMES DILLON; RONALD SMITH, Unknown TULARE

4

COUNTY SHERIFF=S DEPUTIES named herein, as Does 7-50, (collectively "Defendants," and

5

together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record,

6
7

that Plaintiff may file a Seccond Amended Complaint. This amendment will not modify any date or
deadline fixed by the Court's Scheduling Order dated January 30, 2018, and is not prejudicial to

8
9
10

Defendants, the product of undue delay, proposed in bad faith, or futile.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff will file his Second Amended Complaint within

11

five (5) calendar days of the Court's Order permitting such filing, and that Defendants' response

12

thereto shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days after the First Amended Complaint is filed.

13

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

14

Dated: April 11, 2018

TULARE COUNTY COUNSEL

15

/s/ Amy T. Myers

16

Amy Terrible Myers
Attorneys for Defendants

17
18

Dated: April 11, 2018

OWDOM LAW FIRM

19
20
21

/s/ Matthew Owdom
Matthew D. Owdom
Attorney for Plaintiff

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

County

2
JOINT STIPULATION

ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaint within five
(5) calendar days of the date this Order is filed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' response thereto shall be filed within
twenty-one (21) days after the Second Amended Complaint is filed.

7
8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 12, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

County

3
JOINT STIPULATION