Drake v. Kernan, et al.

Filing 67

ORDER ADOPTING 58 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Granting Defendants' 53 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and Dismissing Conspiracy Claim, without Prejudice signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 08/23/2019. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAM DRAKE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01500-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, AND DISMISSING CONSPIRACY CLAIM, WITHOUT PREJUDICE [ECF Nos. 53, 58] 17 Plaintiff Sam Drake is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On June 21, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending 21 that Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted, and the conspiracy claims against 22 Defendants Allison and Moak be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust the 23 administrative remedies. (ECF No. 58.) The Findings and Recommendation was served on the parties 24 and contained notice that objections were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff filed 25 objections on July 8, 2019. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this Court 2 has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including 3 Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record 4 and proper analysis. 5 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on June 21, 2019, are adopted in full; 7 2. Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted; and 8 3. The conspiracy claims against Defendants Allison and Moak are dismissed, without 9 prejudice, for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: August 23, 2019 13 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?