S.B., et al v. California Department of Education, et al.
Filing
5
ORDER granting 4 Petition for Guardians Ad Litem signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/15/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
S.B., a minor, by and through her guardians ad )
litem KRISTINA B. and MICHAEL B., and )
)
KRISTINA B. and MICHAEL B.,
)
Individually,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
)
EDUCATION and THE STATE OF
)
)
CALIFORNIA,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No.: 1:17-cv-01507-LJO-BAM
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR
GUARDIANS AD LITEM
(Doc. No. 4)
20
On November 9, 2017, Plaintiff S.B., a minor by and through her guardians ad litem Kristina
21
B. and Michael B., submitted a petition for the appointment of guardians ad litem in conjunction with
22
the initial complaint. (Doc. No. 4.)
23
“District courts have a special duty, derived from Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c), to
24
safeguard the interests of litigants who are minors.” Robidoux v. Rosengren, 638 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th
25
Cir. 2011). Rule 17 provides that “[t]he court must appoint a guardian ad litem—or issue another
26
appropriate order—to protect a minor or incompetent person who is unrepresented in an action.” Fed.
27
R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2).
28
1
1
Local Rule 202(a) of this Court further states, in pertinent part:
2
3
4
5
Upon commencement of an action or upon initial appearance in defense of an action by
or on behalf of a minor . . . the attorney representing the minor or incompetent person
shall present . . . a motion for the appointment of a guardian ad litem by the Court, or . .
. a showing satisfactory to the Court that no such appointment is necessary to ensure
adequate representation of the minor or incompetent person.
6
7
See L.R. 202(a).
8
The decision to appoint a guardian ad litem “must normally be left to the sound discretion of
9
the trial court.” United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, 795 F.2d 796, 804 (9th Cir. 1986). By the
10
petition, Plaintiff seeks to have the court to appoint Kristina B. and Michael B. as guardians ad litem to
11
their minor child, Plaintiff S.B. Kristina B. and Michael B. are the parents of Plaintiff S.B., a sixteen-
12
year-old minor, and allege that they are competent to act as her guardians, have no interests adverse to
13
her rights and are competent and responsible to prosecute the proposed action for her. (Doc. No. 4.)
14
15
Finding good cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Kristina B. and Michael B. are appointed
as guardians ad litem for Plaintiff S.B. in this action.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
November 15, 2017
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?